NO never suiside~!
[Q
[/QUOTE]
--> Crucifying him doesn't save our sins either but save us as a whole. See my previous comment.[/QUOTE]
Since when are we saved by crucifying the representative of God? Do you understand the meaning you are implying? You are saying that crucifying the representative of God is saving us, as a whole or whatever. Do you even realize the implications of the statement you just made? Since priests, bishops, or whatever "office" in the Church are "representatives" of God, if we crucify them, then that act is saving us from whatever we need saving from, i.e sins, etc. If you say otherwise, what makes them different from Jesus, who simply said that he is the representative of God (John 5:37, )?
To put it in a nutshell bro, you are saying that if we crucify any person that actually does the will of the almighty Father, we are saved. How perverted is that? Do you please God by crucifying his representative, kicking his representative in the face, punching his representative? If you were God, would you find it pleasing to see your Son, who is doing your will, crucified? Again, your beliefs are devoid of or violates the rules of Love, which is what relationships are centered on. As the saying goes, "God is Love".
Now regarding your statement that Jesus is God, and that he became human in order to die on the cross, it is the same with the Impersonalist philosophy in India. They say that God is all-powerful, but sometime descends to this world, forgets that he is God, and suffers miseries just like any mortal. Since when does God become human and have to suffer on the cross just to save mankind from whatever? This is the same as limiting God's power. Since when does God have to sacrifice himself in order to save mankind?
Jesus' sacrifice is this: he came here to teach people that by unconditionally loving the Supreme Father, we can be freed by our sins. Not only that, we will be truly happy. His sacrifice was not through crucifixion, rather by enduring all hardships just to teach people about LOVE FOR GOD. If his crucifixion were the sacrifice that was necessary, he would have never said the following "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do." (Luke 23:24). Why do you think he said that following passage? Does it mean that his crucifixion is both a "good" and "bad" thing?
And since you said Judas is now a saint, why not include Caiaphas and the other high priests? Why not include Herod, who tried to kill Jesus Christ when he was born? Why not include those that persecuted the apostles? You declare a "saint" someone who tortured, betrayed, and murdered God's representative? How offensive can you get? Again, the laws of Love. Do you endear yourself to someone you love by becoming friends with their enemy, tormentor, etc? Or by holding their enemies in high regard?
Nope its called sacrifice Jesus died for all our sins for us to be forgiven and saved. Christ didn't even die permanently he was resurected so he knows he wont die but just suffer, so its not even close to suicide. if you believe in the resurrection but that is OT.
Suicide is dying for yourself because of a problem or love sick problems ect. Its called dying for nothing.
Sacrifice yourself to save someone has a big difference to suicide. The former is motivated by love, courage and selflessness while the latter is selfishness and foolishness.
Last edited by Kenshiro; 04-02-2011 at 08:14 PM.
Similar Threads |
|