The Roman Catholic Church~ Questions

[SioDenz]

---

Isnt it obvious as the EXPLANATION ?

Gi explain nako na ang star sa xmas tree mao na ang star that guided the 3 Magi's.

Kay ug INTERPRETED pa na .... there are more to it. Attributed ra man na s aisa ka object ang STAR sa XMAS TREE , sa BRIGHT STAR during the Ephipany.

Ako lan gi klaru when you say Based, unsay meaning sa Based.

[SioDenz]

i don't see how Jesus died as a human kay He was risen as a God as well as a human ug iya giapil ug dala iya body pagsaka sa langit.. i accept nga maybe Jesus did suffer like a human but if muingon ka that Jesus died like a human., i don't think so..

So nag suffer as a human but Died as a God? Unsa diay Purpose sa pagpakatawo, di ba para mamatay man ang tawhanung lawas? unsaon pagkamatay as a God nga di man kaha mamatay ang God?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

@ SIO ...

Kanang mga ONE LINER nimo are way of twisting and confusing our audience here hehehehehe .

Asking questions kung INTERPRETED ba or what is BASED does not all reconcile to the idea. Instead , the question should go like this :

WHAT is the DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INTERPRETATION and BASED sa BIBLE ?

Like I said , RCC holds the EXPLANATION , the rest carries the INTERPRETATION . Mao bitaw naay compilation nahitabo because it was explained what is rightful and inspired by the Holy Spirit that reserves all the right to be considered the WORD of GOD which is our HOLY BIBLE.

[dartzed]

So nag suffer as a human but Died as a God? Unsa diay Purpose sa pagpakatawo, di ba para mamatay man ang tawhanung lawas? unsaon pagkamatay as a God nga di man kaha mamatay ang God?

mao na ako question bro..

nagpakatao para mamatay but in the end wala man jud namatay kay nabanhaw man..

so asa man ang sacrifice ana?..

[Xian120]

i don't see how Jesus died as a human kay He was risen as a God as well as a human ug iya giapil ug dala iya body pagsaka sa langit.. i accept nga maybe Jesus did suffer like a human but if muingon ka that Jesus died like a human., i don't think so..

i personally think that the resurrection story was just made up, i dont know but wa koy nabasa nga account sa bible telling nga ni resurrect siya nor did anyone really saw the event.. ang akong nabasahan are just implication nga ni resurrect.. if naa do enlighten me..

but assuming nga ni ressurect, i think bringing along the human body is nothing but a choice.. He indeed died in the cross, but as a God, Jesus have no choice but to live again.. para ma witness sa mga followers and to fulfill the prophecy that will live again along with the body..

[seven_segment]

mao na ako question bro..

nagpakatao para mamatay but in the end wala man jud namatay kay nabanhaw man..

so asa man ang sacrifice ana?..

Jesus set the greatest example...we have to sacrifice our life for a friend...

"there is no greater love, than to lay down one's life"

laying down one's life is already a "sacrifice"

kahibaw naka ana brad oi...


but the prize of sacrificing is "resurrection"...we will be resurrected...

Jesus set the example!

everything...from being Baptized and through His Passion...and Resurrection...

[dartzed]

Jesus set the greatest example...we have to sacrifice our life for a friend...

"there is no greater love, than to lay down one's life"

laying down one's life is already a "sacrifice"

kahibaw naka ana brad oi...


but the price of sacrificing is "resurrection"...we will be resurrected...

Jesus set the example!

everything...from being Baptized and through His Passion...and Resurrection...

mao na dha ang wala nko masabtan ug samot..

u said resurrection is the prize of sacrifice, how'd you know?..

i never read sa bible nga naresurrect kay nagsacrifice other than Jesus.. although naay case ni Lazarus but dead nman to cya daan and there was no passages nga nagsacrifice cya..

[newbie.86]

@ SIO ...

Kanang mga ONE LINER nimo are way of twisting and confusing our audience here hehehehehe .

Asking questions kung INTERPRETED ba or what is BASED does not all reconcile to the idea. Instead , the question should go like this :

WHAT is the DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INTERPRETATION and BASED sa BIBLE ?

Like I said , RCC holds the EXPLANATION , the rest carries the INTERPRETATION . Mao bitaw naay compilation nahitabo because it was explained what is rightful and inspired by the Holy Spirit that reserves all the right to be considered the WORD of GOD which is our HOLY BIBLE.

AMEN to this brother.

EXPLANATION -- relating to facts

INTERPRETATION -- relating to "fallible" opinions.

That is why out of 35,000 Protestant denominations they can also interpret the Bible 35,000 times and they don't know which one of the interpretations is correct.

[dartzed]

i personally think that the resurrection story was just made up, i dont know but wa koy nabasa nga account sa bible telling nga ni resurrect siya nor did anyone really saw the event.. ang akong nabasahan are just implication nga ni resurrect.. if naa do enlighten me..

but assuming nga ni ressurect, i think bringing along the human body is nothing but a choice.. He indeed died in the cross, but as a God, Jesus have no choice but to live again.. para ma witness sa mga followers and to fulfill the prophecy that will live again along with the body..

mao na wa nko nasabtan lagi if magmake kag sacrifice imo jud na ihatag in Jesus' iya lawas ang mamatay ang nakaapan lang why nabuhi man iya lawas nga mao man to ang gihalad..

[seven_segment]

mao na dha ang wala nko masabtan ug samot..

u said resurrection is the price of sacrifice, how'd you know?..

wrong spelling ko brod...

tsk...tsk...tsk...

"PRIZE" diay...

but don't compare it to a game...

mao na ang reward sa Ginoo, if we will follow Christ...

resurrection and life everlasting...