Porgartoryo

[bcasabee]

I think, there are some humans who are authorized to interpret what is in the Bible otherwise who will interpret the Bible for us?
And before the Bible became the Bible, it was compiled first from different books, and who compiled them? As far as I know, it as the Catholic church who compiled the Bible. If the Bible is not corrupt, then what church should we credit for compiling the uncorrupted Bible?

[seven_segment]

I think, there are some humans who are authorized to interpret what is in the Bible otherwise who will interpret the Bible for us?
And before the Bible became the Bible, it was compiled first from different books, and who compiled them? As far as I know, it as the Catholic church who compiled the Bible. If the Bible is not corrupt, then what church should we credit for compiling the uncorrupted Bible?

man could not interpret the Bible fully...you need the Holy Spirit to guide and help you...

else...tuyok tuyok ka ana...best is not to lean on your own understanding but to lean to the Lord...to His Wisdom...

[bcasabee]

Yeah your right, I agree with you, you need the holy spirit's guidance to interpret the Bible. Does that mean that the Catholic Church when they were compiling the Bible were also guided by the Holy Spirit during those compilation sessions? Logically, they should be, right?

[seven_segment]

Yeah your right, I agree with you, you need the holy spirit's guidance to interpret the Bible. Does that mean that the Catholic Church when they were compiling the Bible were also guided by the Holy Spirit during those compilation sessions? Logically, they should be, right?

The Bible is the written Word of God...it is from God no one could corrupt it...therefore from the time this was being compiled there is no such thing as "corrupt"

[bcasabee]

So that means, If I'm going to compile another set of books and claim it is the true Bible, would make my statement valid? Well, I believe when the Catholic Church when they were compiling the Bible where guided by the Holy Spirit, otherwise, they might had inserted the wrong set of books. Remember there were said to be other Gospel books which were not included in the Bible.

[seven_segment]

So that means, If I'm going to compile another set of books and claim it is the true Bible, would make my statement valid? Well, I believe when the Catholic Church when they were compiling the Bible where guided by the Holy Spirit, otherwise, they might had inserted the wrong set of books. Remember there were said to be other Gospel books which were not included in the Bible.

nah...murag Dan Brown...wakekeke

precisely brod! God won't allow it to be corrupted...

[YJOB]

The bible itself is not corrupt, but it's the best book to use for corruption by preaching a different interpretation.

[amico]

kung bright gyud ang ginoo ngano wa naman nyang gisuwat ang libro ug gihulog sa langit aron wa nay lalis kay lro gyud na syay gasuwat ug klaro pud ang mga sibnuwatan na klaro ug pasabot. binuang manang gikan kuno sa ginoo. kung tinuod pa ana na buhi ang ginoo kadali ra ang solution ana magpakita gud sya sa tanan ug ihatag niyo ang iyang mga buot ipabuhat sa tao. maglalis ta bahin sa libro apan ang nagsuwat diay nangamatay na ug wa pa gyud ka kabao na gipang-ilisan na nang naa diha. gipamakakan na diay mo.

[jntio]

naa nalng para madali

[amingb]

Matt 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

Its a Familiar Verse pero wata kasabot.

Ug makita na nato sayon ra pagsabot sa gipanulat diha sa Bible bisan bugo pa kaau ta.

Ug kinsay maka explain ani ug maau salamat daan.