this is not entrapment? who would a briber give a marked money to the person he wants to bribe? common sense.The 500, 000 is not a physical evidence even if it looks that way. It is not marked money. Under the rules on evidence it will be a weak proof to a crime.
then who is to you is more believable? those cabinet secretaries? who don't know what to answer? which the version changes day by day?Friends, hindi dahil alagad ng simbahan si Fr. Panlilio ay mas kapanipaniwala nang siya lang ang tama.
that made it more believable.What did he say? He just said he received money in Malacanang. Just that. It was even a staff of Jonjon Mendoza who gave it to him.
would they be stupid enough to leave a paper trail? common sense.The OP finance personnel even replied to Fr. Ed that no disbursement was made for his province.
nandoon ba siya noong binigay ang pera? wise move indeed... left the building then give the money... no implications...Iiimplicate ba ng Pangulo ang sarili niya?
then where does the money came from? just plain hulog ng langit?
In whatever angle you look at those gift giving... Corruption is ever present.
- It was said that the money will be used for the barangay... guys it's election time, barangay elections are non-partisan.
- When money will change hands between public officials, transparency and papers should be involved? was there any? None.
- Does this money came from a private personality? Then why was it given in a place could MalacaƱang, MalacaƱang is no private place, last time i've heard it's prohibited for public to demonstrate within certain radius.
hahay... kamo na lay pag fanatic.



 
			
			 Re: Is there really bribery?
 Re: Is there really bribery?
				 
       
					
					
					
						 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
			 or just plain
 or just plain 

 
			 
			 
						 
			 
						
