
Originally Posted by
nocram
@sumaganday,let me give some very smart idea.about erap na wa mo resign but instead he was kicked out of malacanang?ang imong sige ug ingon nga illegal illegal,ang balaod gihimo lang sa tao ok


busa tao ra sad ang mag usab ani.kung gusto sa mga tawo nga i footbol na cya wa cyay mahimo.nakasabot kaba ug unsay gobyerno?mga tawo,dili si erap ang magbuot.ok?abe nako ug smart kaayo ka.
True, sovereingty emanates from the people. In the overall analysis it is the people who will decide who will govern the country.
That is why I would say that revolution and coup is justified in certain circumstances where our institution has already failed to function properly.
But that is not the point. Ok, lets accept that EDSA 2 was a revolution of the people. GMA has no right to succeed Erap because she is PART of the Erap government being the Vice President at that time. When it was a revolution GMA should go down with it. The wrong thing about it is that she wanted to succeed Erap.
There was no succession. Succession to the presidency could only occur in cases of death, incapacity, impeachment or resignation. But Erap did not die, was not incapacitated, was not impeached and all the more did not resign. So why GMA would insist herself to be sworn in as Erap's successor.
Tsk, she was even heard to say that " Sige na, i swear na ako."