Debate about pre-marital s.ex

[ulyssa_marie]

---

exactly.

even i would just drop it and say NO.


But i got stuck with the Yes team... and i'm left with the wall to bang my head on with such an obvious scenario which such an obvious CORRECT ANSWER which i unfortunately have to prove wrong. GAHHH!! *bang bang*

[xenon_ian]

nice ni na topic da,,hmmmmm

[petite fleur]

exactly.

even i would just drop it and say NO.


But i got stuck with the Yes team... and i'm left with the wall to bang my head on with such an obvious scenario which such an obvious CORRECT ANSWER which i unfortunately have to prove wrong. GAHHH!! *bang bang*

Do you really have to win?? Oh graded man tingale ni hehehe
pa pilde nalang mu hehehe

[jack_bauer]

Okay, I would just like to clarify, usa. Are you asking for points/tips to defend the stand YES to premarital *** or you need to convince Lesie to have *** with Joey? I am quite confused somehow.

I somehow find the situation as biased. So please enlighten me. TIA!

korek bai..

my bad.. all the while i was giving reactions on the assumptions na humana sila ug *** and that they have committed PMS already..

xenxa TS..

[ulyssa_marie]

Do you really have to win?? Oh graded man tingale ni hehehe
pa pilde nalang mu hehehe

definitely graded...

obvious jud kinsa mu daog noh? hahahahaha wa pa gani mi k debate, pilde noon. hahahaha

[noel_llapa]

The issue won't easily be resolved unless sulayan firsthand sa mga debaters kung maayo ba jud ning PMS. ^_^

[ulyssa_marie]

korek bai..

my bad.. all the while i was giving reactions on the assumptions na humana sila ug *** and that they have committed PMS already..

xenxa TS..

wala pa sila nag ahem-ahem LOL

it's like we have to give reasons to why she SHOULD have s.ex with him or its ok to have s.ex with him.

it's not exactly "go pre.marital s.ex" on its own since thats quite a vague opinion. So with this specific scenario.. obviously.. the correct answer would be NO! not with a guy who'd give that kind of reasoning.. but... *bangs head on wall*

[ulyssa_marie]

The issue won't easily be resolved unless sulayan firsthand sa mga debaters kung maayo ba jud ning PMS. ^_^

i think Sir had the idea that EVERYONE would have gone to the "YES PMS!", so he let us draw lots before telling us the scenario.

Those who got the "YES PMS!" (a.k.a me and several others), were roaring with happiness - until he recited the scenario and we all banged our heads on the tables. hahaha

ka lisod!

[jack_bauer]

The issue won't easily be resolved unless sulayan firsthand sa mga debaters kung maayo ba jud ning PMS. ^_^

korek bai.. when i was young.. ako stand ani kay OK ra gyud mg PMS..
sus.. swertiha wala gyud tawn ko nasipyat..

OnT: TS if you have to convince the girl na dapat xa mki PMS maybe you can do this by arguing that she has to do her part as a partner.. that *** is integral to the relationship as a whole and that its absence could make it or break it in the context that man has this considerable need for *** and so as women..

you can play devil by branding the girlfriend selfish.. hehehehehe
iya self ra iya gihuna2x and iya ra family.. wala niya gi think ang iya uyab (laki).. mga needs nya specially sa ***.. as much as possible maximise on the concept na need and *** in order to make the relationship survives.. haha

set aside ur personal beliefs nlang, play the role as convincing as you are then for sure you'll have good grades.. hehe

[ulyssa_marie]

you can play devil by branding the girlfriend selfish..

these words echoed in my mind repeatedly.

very good point u have there. I mean.. they HAVE been going out since Highschool (high school sweet heart)... so.. a man can only take so much of being s.ex deprived...right? haha