for me dili equal oi.. if fling2x lng cguro..
nganung pag dug-on man lage ko bii, undang man lage ug panguhit akong room mate sako peo lab japun ko nia..heheh..
seriously, akong mama ug papa d man sexually active (maminaw jud ko sa ilang kwarto. ana ko kapervert) peo they still stick with each other and share the same room and i could still hear them laugh at some old jokes...so from experience, i beg to disagree....
Unsay gicomprise anang romantic love?
Akong nabaw-an ato sa Christian Living namo nga subjects pag highschool kay 3 man to kacomponents sa theory. Intimacy, Passion, Commitment.
Kung ang romantic love niinclude lang ug passion, kung wala nay body contact, aww, diba given nga since mao man na ang basis sa relasyon, kung mawala nang pakighilawas, mawala sad jud na ang relationship?
IMHO, good relationships have a good foundation with intimacy. Spiced up with passion. Maintained with commitment.
waaaaaahhh.. bitaw bitaw.. ka relate ko ani sakong past.. hehehe ataka..
hehe equal ni sila in its sense kay kung maka feel kag love...ma feel sad nimo ang lust...so parehas ra sila. kung maka feel kag lust..pwede na sad na siya nga love..you may deny it but Lust is Love..maybe on its first stage and can go away anytime...just like Love...it can go away anytime. But yes true that Lust can exist without Love...as what I have already said...and thats the sad part....but come to think of it..when you feel lust..in the case that it exists w/o love..but given the chance that you have access to love..wont this Lust normally already is Love? and is just waiting to bloom?
yes love is wet love is wild love is Lust
actually..kaning Love..ang naka feel ray maka ingon nga inluv sila...we wont rili know unsay na feel sa tawo...kung nag stick sila together..theres a lot of other reasons.. d madag enumerate. kanang ikaw jud mismo ang naka feel nga inluv ka..then huna hunaa kung Lust ba sad..kay if you will say nga in love ka w/o lust..aw...kana d na ko mulalis.
Similar Threads |
|