Lacson can represent our country well..
I think what he did is heroic also...
Running for presidential elections bisan gamay ra iya chance para lang mabuwag ang oposition..
then, preventing the late FPJ to win the elections..
Lacson can represent our country well..
I think what he did is heroic also...
Running for presidential elections bisan gamay ra iya chance para lang mabuwag ang oposition..
then, preventing the late FPJ to win the elections..
And later on becoming an opposition and not one crying and bitching came from him when he knew pildi siya sa election w/c is another tactic from him to prevent any scandals .... oppurtunities like these ang ginahulat niya ang syle ni Lacson .... he is no HERO my friend .. OPPURTUNISTA nuon .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
na ilad ko ni lacson.. he took that risk para mailad ko.. wa siyay batasan.. heh!
It was NOT HEROIC because that was not his motivation and objective to start with. Of course when he ran he wanted to win. Why did he run ot at least thought that he had the chance of winning? It is for 3 reasons and 3 reasons only:Originally Posted by nopeace
1] He also had the machinery and money to rig the elections.
2] He thought that his false "supercop" image will win the public.
3] They did not come into a deal or understanding with the opposition. Do you remember that when he sensed that he had no chance of winning, he immediately conceded to the ADMINISTRATION to earn their political good graces?
Yes he may have the money, but dont have the balls to rig the election.Originally Posted by LytSlpr
And what do you call GMA's presidency? legitimate? As far as Im concern she rigged the last election, kay kun wala pa to tikasi, adto cya puniton sa kangkongan.Originally Posted by LytSlpr
Conceding is a characteristic of a man who's a good sport.Originally Posted by LytSlpr
What do you mean to earn thier political good graces? Are you nuts! Did they offer him anything?
1.Â* don't have the balls to rig the election?Â* i'm sure he did rig it, too.Â* he just didn't rig it right.
2.Â* since you are certain that arroyo rigged the elections, let's put it this way: if she hadn't rigged it right, lacson's rigging could have worked. or if he rigged it right, he could have won.
3.Â* conceding being balimbing, that is.Â*
all these are presumptions.Â* in the world of politics, doubt is a constant, not a variable.
WATCH YOUR ATTITUDE!
clean it up.... go lacson go lacson..... --- e t i v a c ---
Ayaw intawn pamahid sa inyong tae...abi kay nanimaho...mangamong na mo...Originally Posted by PissKhanXXX
Baho pa sa tae si GMA karon do!
I beg to disagree...FPJ could have won...Lacson only got 5M votes, compared to 12M to your fake president...mao nay nanikas?Originally Posted by PissKhanXXX
How could you even say that? When in fact months after the election he exposed the First Gentleman as the person in Jose Pidal account.Originally Posted by PissKhanXXX
Kung mo concede defeat diay ko ani ato aguements balimbing na diay ko?
... bisan pag knsa ang modaog, kng naay mo oppos tapos powerful kaau, gubot lang ghapon... u know wat, sa klarong storya lang, dri sa Pilipinas karon tungod sa kalisod bsag unsa nlang ang mahimo madautan man or dli... mga Pinoy krn hangol kaau sa power especially sa politics... its a big BUSINESS wen your n POLITICS... maski sa position as a TRAFFIC AID paga ilogan pa, how much more kaha sa pagka PRESIDENTE sa PILIPINAS... BAGA NA KAAU MGA NAWONG ANG MGA POLITICIAN KARON....![]()
![]()
BWEHEHEHE
1] Are you nuts? Lacson? No balls to rig an election? YEAH RIGHT!Originally Posted by omar50071
2] You reaction is not related to the statement.
3] How naive can you be? An offer may not always active, it can be passive. Gets?
Similar Threads |
|