to CBCP(Catholic Bishop's Conference of the Philippines)...this is too much...

[FK]

---

sori to disappoint you OMAD, but that is FK's main course of discussion here..always making a parallel of every political scenarios [particularly about PGMA's] to the past regimes of ERAP and MARCOS.

and what's wrong with that? they are all similar? they are all beleaguered with issues. And all of them are charge to be corrupt. So again what's wrong with that?

hahayzzz... og ngano kinahanglan pa man nimo ingnon si Omad about my main course of discussion? hahayzzz...

[dagget]

sus naa gali manikas nako nya mo ingon na si archbishop ni ingon okay ra mo cheat....

ingnon gyud nako muslim ko wala koy paki anang archbishop ninyo......... basta tikas.... tikas gyud na.....

[tolstoi]

and what's wrong with that? they are all similar? they are all beleaguered with issues. And all of them are charge to be corrupt. So again what's wrong with that?

the issue is that PGMA has yet to be proven as the likes of Marcos and Erap..Marcos & Erap were booted out by people power coz of their blatant corruption, while PGMA only got allegations and tons of speculations.

[baron]

It was always like that. From the start they have been accusing the administration of various allegations which were never proven in any way. All that they have done is continue crying foul to every actions and programs which are implemented under this administration.

[FK]

the issue is that PGMA has yet to be proven as the likes of Marcos and Erap..Marcos & Erap were booted out by people power coz of their blatant corruption, while PGMA only got allegations and tons of speculations.

i'm talking at the issues... ERAP case is still on trial meaning it was not yet proven. Does being booted out proves anything? Does it prove that the allegation and speculations are true?

Even the SC, sees the parallelism with Marcos and GMA ways on dealing things.

[iloveyou4ever]

i'm talking at the issues... ERAP case is still on trial meaning it was not yet proven. Does being booted out proves anything? Does it prove that the allegation and speculations are true?

Even the SC, sees the parallelism with Marcos and GMA ways on dealing things.

Even if he (Erap Rapapeps) is under trial, the evidence is strong against him. In PGMA, everything is merely allegations, walay proof.

[FK]

Even if he (Erap Rapapeps) is under trial, the evidence is strong against him. In PGMA, everything is merely allegations, walay proof.

well that's your opinion... then let's have the impeachment shall we? to see once and for all if there are no proof.

but what about the Garci conversation? can you say that they are note discussing about cheating?

[tolstoi]

well that's your opinion... then let's have the impeachment shall we? to see once and for all if there are no proof.

but what about the Garci conversation? can you say that they are discussing about cheating?

heheh..i prove sa lagi sa korte kung naa ba gyud cheating =)

[wanderlust]

well that's your opinion... then let's have the impeachment shall we? to see once and for all if there are no proof.

Again, that's not how impeachment works. You just don't expect taxpayers' money spent on a full-blown impeachment just because you said you have evidence. You have to show that your case can stand on its merits.

[FK]

Again, that's not how impeachment works. You just don't expect taxpayers' money spent on a full-blown impeachment just because you said you have evidence. You have to show that your case can stand on its merits.

I know... base on the 1st complaint? did we arrive at the merits? NO a BIG NO.

Yeah your madam president may get away with it today... i don't know next year or the year after next. But in public opinion he is guilty... even you, i assume can't defend her in public. Just like here... where we don't go through the rules of court. Coz as far as i remember... no pro-GMA has even prove that indeed she did not cheat even using common sense. They just also keep on harping.
- Just prove it in court. (this is not the court)
- That are just speculations (aren't we all speculating here)
- Who does not cheat anyway? (as if cheating is not a crime)

Oh well even a bishop finds no wrong in cheating maybe you can excused in finding no fault in GMA's cheating.