Murag ni bahag ang ikog ni San Miguel pag tawag ni mam dha.....
Gi saaran cguro ug Borjer....mao ni tumbling.
Murag ni bahag ang ikog ni San Miguel pag tawag ni mam dha.....
Gi saaran cguro ug Borjer....mao ni tumbling.
layoa ra ana oi...Eliot Spitzer resigned as NY Gov coz klaro kaayo ang mga ebidensya about his tryst w/ Kirsten...dili na hearsay. even Kirsten admitted it. kanang kasoha dili na madala ug "sorry"...that's tantamount to adultery and conduct unbecoming of a public official.Originally Posted by balatucan
"he had been intercepted on a federal wiretap confirming plans to meet a call girl from a high-priced prostitution service in Washington, leaving the public stunned and angered and bringing business in the State Capitol to a halt."
now if u compare that to the Hello Garci or ZTE, asa man ang ebidencya? if we say kad2 wire-tap diay, is it admissible as evidence? did it really indicate pgma was cheating? AFAIK, her only fault was just calling a Comelec official w/c is a no no. and for ZTE, delayed ang pgka cancel sa contract. resignan diay na nimo? pastilan...
besides, we have diff. wire-tapping laws in da Phils. in the US, they have federal laws on wire-tapping...
kng moingon ta nanawag c pgma ug macho dancer para mo-jerjer, kana nuon...resign w/o thinking jud na...hikihikhik
---ooo---
now back to the topic, dili nlng nato surang surangon c Lacson karong panahona ky kuwang nlng gamay mag wild nana...hehe
murag nag regress na cguro ni c Pingy. ti-aw mo na, sulti dayon kno nga ang sgt at arms nka dungog ni San Miguel "opo mam i-deny ko"...kumbinsing! another hearsay napud...klaro kaayong nahutdan na cya ug bala. what a pity.
Mao na diha karon ... as long as walay ma produce na CONCRETE and SOLID EVIDENCES in BLACK and WHITE DOCUMENTS , it will remain as a HEARSAY and CHISMIS , just like what we are used to here in the FORUMS basta walay link ma provide lolz !
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
apil ni sa Filipino mentality kanang maminaw og storbot![]()
Walay problema ang maminaw sa STORBOT , ang dili maayo kay kanang ma SHOT ka sa TARO ^ .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
"did it really indicate pgma was cheating? "Originally Posted by giddyboy
If you still think up until now that they were merely talking non sense, imo ra gi ilad imo kaugalingon ana.
"is it admissible as evidence?"
Technically no, but in public opinion like here in the forum, yes
Did GMA admit it was her voice in the tape?
What is she sorry for?
why would she disallow Gen. Gudani and a Col. to testify in court and eventually court martialed?
It sounds like you are banking on technicalities re "Hello Garci", and I thought you are what you call critical thinker. If you really are what you say, technicalities should not be an issue, that is for the court. The truth knows no technicalities. The truth is staring at you in the face already, yet you say not admissible in court? You sound like lawyering to me.
Screwing a prostitute is far from screwing our votes, that is why Clinton got away with it.Originally Posted by giddyboy
You are putting more weight on screwing a prostitute than disrespecting the constitution, now that is sad...tsk tsk tsk![]()
![]()
![]()
kapoy na kau na cla paminwan oi....
i can't imagine sa kalagot ni pingky lacson that time. lol
Ang problem ana nga statement of yours... unsa nga Version of Truth imo gusto paminawon ra? Coz,
everyone has its own version of TRUTH kunohay if no solid evidence is presented. Mao na nga ang mga
argumento sa forum mag tuyok2x lang!
amen! PEACE!
Originally Posted by omar50071
Ang problema pud sa uban kay ang technicalities ang basehan, nga dili man intawn ni korte ang forum.Originally Posted by pandisal
Mao na ato timbangon kinsay nag sulti sa tinoud, dili kay ato tago-an ang tinuod.
Mao na problema preh, kay kung sa korte, it always be technicalities and solid evidence while if
you want to have the public to have the last say... it's called mob rules... ang blema asa nga side
ang daghan nga mobs.... so ang ako lang ma sulti, walay kapaingnan gihapon ... until 2010, dili
gihapon mapa lagpot si GMA since mob rule minus military is no mob rule/aka people power rule!
as for the corruptions, it is 100% true that there is indeed a corruption, no doubt about it, ang blema
is the person or persons pursuing the ouster has their own agenda and themselves are corrupt
specially Lacson.
Originally Posted by omar50071
Similar Threads |
|