Loose Change 2nd Edition - 9/11 Conspiracy Documentary

[hotspur]

how about the series of links nga giprovide ni weedmeister2, imo nang nabasa? try to review starting from the start of this thread.

[hotspur]

akong nakita nga gamay ra jud kaayo ang mga "facts" gi-provide sa mga anti-conspiracy theorists diri. others provide based on the movies they seen....san mana oi!

[hotspur]

...and despite of this, many would still counter that their side is true. Show your stuff!!!! in order to neutralize the balance that was done by the conspiracy theorists coz it seems that the inclination is getting towards them. labyog nang inyoha diha part....naa man kaha!

[Spec-V]

how about the series of links nga giprovide ni weedmeister2, imo nang nabasa? try to review starting from the start of this thread.

The whole debate starts here in this link my newly registerd istoryan https://www.istorya.net/forums/index....458#msg1881458

[Freeza]

@FREEZA:

saman ning mga images nga gi-present nimo nga mura man ni'g shots gikuha sa luyo building sa MEPZ. wala may klaro kung sa pentagon ba ni! or even if you propose this to be true, is this enough evidence to discredit the testimonies of the many firefighters and other witnesses of the WTC disaster (that the building has turned into ashes due to a series of explosions? how about the mutitudes of the american people who are at present, still waiting for the government and their agencies to answer the questions they wanted be clear? dili ko motuo nga kaning mga tawhana parehas sa ubang pinoy nga pwede ra witkan ug pila ka pesos para lang pasabasabaon sa karsada.

lol those images might be small due to my upload fault its a simple search from pentagon debri google photo ok
atleast my explanation come from my own simple understanding this is no UFO Conspiracy where direct data and evidences are little and much more obscure and dont have sufficient instrumentations for a sufficient scientific investigation.

but if you want we can also search and put other people's words and put it to other people's mouth and we could both look so smart eh?

dont be impress by those pictures and links they post and the tons of tons of questions it could affect and condition your mind
you should at least try to rebut what you want to think to have un bias views

i can assure you, you could find tons and tons of answer in the net and like wise you could ask tons of tons of questions to them.

http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/new...agon/frame.htm

samplesof air crashes almost all are not kamikaze deliberate suicide of course metal aluminum don vaporize they were shred to little or microscopic pieces or burn to melt ...etcc

not all plane disasters have full intact wings or tail section as they want to have










A SIMILAR ONE saw it in national geographi CSI slammed into an aparment thought not deliberatly
the pilot tried everything to slow it down, fullflaps,spoilers deployed maybe even reverse thrust lol who wants to die
unlike the hijack plane it must have been a full throttle speedoo kamikaze deliberate slam dunk

now look here where is your747's intact wing or fuselage another vaporize??









Air Philipines Flight 541, a Boeing 737-200, crashed shortly before landing into a coconut grove look at the tail section it's almost barely recognizable and it's not even a deliberate crash


another vaporize?



http://www.planecrashinfo.com/w921004.htm

this one from the pentagon




hotspur lookkkkkkkk no aircraft debris? vaporize





[img width=500 height=333]http://rense.com/general32/Damage9.jpg[/img]

[img width=500 height=375]http://rense.com/general32/fuselagefragment_MVC-027S.jpg[/img]

more more no debri vaporize crap eh?

[img width=500 height=375]http://img480.imageshack.us/img480/2566/flight77piece1zv0.jpg[/img]

[img width=500 height=375]http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/782/flight77piece2ym8.jpg[/img]

[img width=500 height=333]http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/5368/flight77piece3wz4.jpg[/img]

[img width=500 height=325]http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/7228/pentagondamageclearerviewbj1.jpg[/img]

[img width=500 height=325]http://img480.imageshack.us/img480/1727/pentagontentsok3.jpg[/img]

http://berkley.house.gov/legis/otr/p...2001_0913.html


http://rense.com/general32/phot.htm


http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...cy/q0265.shtml

HUMAN FACTOR CONPIRACY THEORIST CANNOT ANS
If American Airlines Flight 77 didn't crash into the Pentagon, what did happen to the jetliner and all its passengers? Did it vanish into thin air?
The recovery of both black boxes belonging to the Boeing 757 from the Pentagon wreckage

Eyewitness testimony of bystanders who saw and/or heard American Airlines Flight 77 approach and collide with the Pentagon

The recovery and identification of the remains of all but one of the people known to be aboard Flight 77

http://gilroydispatch.com/news/contentview.asp?c=73724

[hotspur]

Ayayayayay! freeza, divert your defenses on my comment which is the WTC testimonials. ikaw nalang kaha ang iparequest nato pa explainon sa mga nangreklamo no? mura'g nice man ka mo expain bro, daghan na tingali ka'g nailad nga chix noh? hehehe......i want more beh, but sa WTC nasad ha. sige go.....

[hotspur]

@spec-v:

tiguwang na diay ka sa istorya bro? ai, mailahan man pud noon sa nawng....hhaahah! just kidding. peace bro! :mrgreen: bitaw, i have read the link and you have explained it good but i would rather cling to the explaination of weedmeister2. he had enlightened me more than you do. but i would suggest to keep it up bro! ....need more research i think. peace!

[Juan Miguel]

here's a fact:


[img width=351 height=500]http://i1.tinypic.com/ml2f47.jpg[/img]

" Heil Dubya! " The New World Order tyrant. The REAL terrorist.

[weedmeister2]

[img width=500 height=375]http://rense.com/general32/fuselagefragment_MVC-027S.jpg[/img]

Bai freeza, the picture you posted above just proves that IT WAS NOT A PASSENGER PLANE that hit the pentagon...

Do you know how soft the nosecone is of a passenger airliner? There is NO WAY a passenger jet could punch such a hole into a reinforced wall such as that... let alone 3 RINGS INTO the pentagon...

Okay, lets just say that IT COULD...

SO, WHERE IS THIS ULTRA STONG NOSECONE OR PLANE PART THAT WAS ABLE TO PUNCH THROUGH ALL THOSE REINFORCED WALLS? Don't tell me it "vaporized" after making this huge hole...?

It is common sense (and the laws of physics) that dictates that something so strong as to punch through all those reinforced walls must be intact enough in its entire form to punch such a large final hole... or is this another of the 9/11 "miracles"



For reference, let me post this image of a British Airways Boeing 757 that had to make an emergency landing:

[img width=500 height=380]http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b263/bushdakta_one/nosecone.jpg[/img]


Reason for NOSECONE DAMAGE?

BIRD STRIKE.


http://www.airliners.net/open.file/167822/L


And you're telling me it punched through all those walls in the Pentagon...? Come on man, let's use our common sense... So, if it wasn't the nosecone, what was it, and why did something so strong as to be able to punch through all those walls suddenly VAPORIZE after making that huge hole...?


Please answer this.

[dagget]

laws of physics

Kinetic energy............ the more speed the more energy