God's Existence Has Been DISPROVEN!!! (Well, Almost)

[mr.ho_chia2]

---

hahaha. correct. maulaw man pud ta ana sir kalanrakas......... usahay pud typographical error lang, o dili tinuyuan. hehe. lol

[shimiyu]

none bottom last post bro. you got people confused. hehe

hehe sige i'll transfer it upstairs.

[shimiyu]

Epicurus posed the following problem in the Second Century BCE.
Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot.
Or he can, but does not want to.
Or he cannot, and does not want to.
If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent.
If he can, but does not want to, then he is wicked.
If he neither can, nor wants to, he is both powerless and wicked.

"If he can, but does not want to, then he is wicked."
hmmm... What if an alternative exists in such an assertion..?
Mainly, "If he can, but does not want to, then he must have some other purpose."?
Is that a valid alternative..?

(hoping to hear from @The_Child)

[ej___]

"If he can, but does not want to, then he is wicked."
hmmm... What if an alternative exists in such an assertion..?
Mainly, "If he can, but does not want to, then he must have some other purpose."?
Is that a valid alternative..?

(hoping to hear from @The_Child)

Tumpak. :mrgreen:

Unsa kaha na nga purpose?

[kalanrakas]

"If he can, but does not want to, then he is wicked."
hmmm... What if an alternative exists in such an assertion..?
Mainly, "If he can, but does not want to, then he must have some other purpose."?
Is that a valid alternative..?

(hoping to hear from @The_Child)

That is still wickedness 'coz by tolerating evil for some other purpose, god allows suffering on his people. Contradicting his supposed nature negates god.

[Keldricus]

He allows evil to suit His purpose, whatever it may be? So for God is it "the means does not justify the ends"?

[JX]

ARGUMENT FROM SCIENCE

1. Science is always true.
2. Therefore there is no room for religious faith.
3. Therefore, God doesn’t exist.

Science is a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method.
Scientific method seeks to explain the complexities of nature in a replicable way, and to use these explanations to make useful predictions.
Predictions arent always true.
therefore, science isnt always true.
therefore, God does exists.


"Crede, ut intelligas"
("Believe in order that you may understand")

[shimiyu]

That is still wickedness 'coz by tolerating evil for some other purpose, god allows suffering on his people. Contradicting his supposed nature negates god.

Who said?


(or what source?)

[mr.ho_chia2]

and by whose standard?

[vladmire]

ARGUMENT FROM SCIENCE

1. Science is always true.
2. Therefore there is no room for religious faith.
3. Therefore, God doesn’t exist.

Science is a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method.
Scientific method seeks to explain the complexities of nature in a replicable way, and to use these explanations to make useful predictions.
Predictions arent always true.
therefore, science isnt always true.
therefore, God does exists.


"Crede, ut intelligas"
("Believe in order that you may understand")

nice..