MERGED: All about Anti-Cybercrime Law, related issues and developments

[PagkahomotSAimongUTOToi]

---

hala uie!! i know for the fact that 50% of the people in congress dont know anything about computers,internet,networking, and how they work, they only let their IT professionals do the work, how can they pass a bill when they dont even know how to debate about it. bisan ang U.S naglisud ug pass sa SOPA, PIPA, tungod nga wla jud sila knowledge ug unsa mga consequences.

bisan ang founder sa internet nakulbaan ani nga bill.

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/...hip-from-sopa/

kani atoa version kay apil mn ang freedom of speech.

[reptoid]

We need to make sure that free speech is preserved. For me public officials are fair game, they chose to live in the spotlight and should be mature enough to cope with a little derision.

[PaYaSo]

watchout! to those forumers who have been harassing me

or i'll better be careful?

[NapoleonBlownapart]

bisan unsa pa imong alyas basta imong IP mao ra ghapon naa ny mokalit ug tok2x sa imong pultahan kung imong tawgon c noy2x ug panot

hahaha.. maabot silag makati ig trace sa akong IP nya naa ra kog cebu

[machinecult]

Under SB 2796, cybercrime offenses would include:

Offenses against the confidentiality, intergrity and availability of computer data and systems (illegal access, illegal interception, data interence, system interference, cyber-squatting, misuse of devices)

Computer-related offenses (computer-related forgery, computer-related fraud)

Content-related offenses (cybersex, child pornography, unsolicited commercial communications, libel)

Read more: Philippine Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (SB 2796)

#3 is already illegal as it is. Unsa man diay purpose ani na bill?

Kung pirated imong software or magtorrent downloads pwede siguro ni nila ma-bend aron ground ka for penalties listed around #1 and #2?

[reptoid]

#3 is already illegal as it is. Unsa man diay purpose ani na bill?

Kung pirated imong software or magtorrent downloads pwede siguro ni nila ma-bend aron ground ka for penalties listed around #1 and #2?

So long as there is no penalty for receiving pirated goods in the physical world of Philippines then I don't see how penalties for virtual piracy can be implemented. I believe that only business institutions and not individuals are deemed accountable for using unlicensed materials, at least that's how things appear.

[machinecult]

^ Thanks for clearing that up. Pero bawal naman na sila diba? So why this bill?

[reptoid]

^ Thanks for clearing that up. Pero bawal naman na sila diba? So why this bill?

Many countries are behind the times and trying to catch up legally with the information age. Some reasons are noble enough such as the desire to tackle stalking, cyber-bullying etc, but some regimes even in developed countries are fearful of the power of social media and are taking steps to control the flow of information. As far is Phils is concerned I think this is probably just a token gesture ie lawmakers trying to appear relevant.

[salbahis]

nah... doesnt stop me from calling that yellow guy retarded... then if they will file a case against me then ill use a pen name to continue...

[Ronzkie23]

Kuha nlng ta daan og "LIBEL CYBER INSURANCE" ani kay hilig raba nako mo hatag og comment and opinion sa mga social sites, forum, blogs, etc! hahahaha!