
 Originally Posted by 
CocoCrunch
					 
				 
				uhm bai as you know, HIV can also be transferred from man-woman, woman-man sexual intercourse. Incubation period of HIV virus is very long thus, as you've said, hard to detect in its' early stage. Straight guys/ladies who got HIV from their straight partners might not be aware they already have it. So, tendency they might also pass HIV testing prior to donation of blood. 
that Vigilant phlebotomist you said doesnt have HIV detector eyes. He is judging the donors objectively and filter them base on his, as you said, "discretion", which also can be considered discrimination not just to that gay person but to the whole gay community. 
Would a straight woman suck a guy's p3nis with a condom?
			
		 
	 
 You can buy flavored condoms on the market it's nothing new. I am not sure if vaginas have taste buds, but why put flavor to taste on condoms?
HIV tests are not 100% accurate and the precaution taken will do well to raise the percentage of ensuring that the recipient do not receive tainted blood. 
It's not about f@gs, it's not about their sexual preference. It's about ensuring that the recipient receive untainted blood. That should be the bigger picture. 
I wouldn't risk taking blood from a prostitute, a seafarer, drug addict or anyone being at risk of being a carrier. Anyone of these people could cry uncle at being discriminated at and no one would raise an eye brow but what makes gays so special and different from the three? Statistics prove that gays make up the majority of HIV carriers. This is a fact.   
Gay = higher percentage of being a carrier.