tax the church especially the catholic church....
tax the church especially the catholic church....
^^ only the business of the churches... kay sa tanaw nako, mas dako man ang ma bulsa sa mga pari kaysa sa ma adto sa mga fobre...
come to think of it..kung ato ni imposan ug tax ang church owned businesses asa man gihapon padulong ang kwarta?..sa bulsa sa mga kurakot nga govt officials!
the Archdioces of Manila is the biggest shareholder of BPI bank, they also own a huge chunk of San Miguel Corporation...............
Aw mao ba? Ka datu gud diay sa Catholic Church......bantog ra walay mo palag..........
Pero kung tinood ni part............wala unta ni labot sa lalis kay I'm sure BPI and San Miguel are already paying taxes to the government.............Malipay nuon ta nga ang church dili pareha sa atoang government nga dili kamao mo patigayon, sige lang ug agad anang foreign loans...na puno nuon ta sa utang.........Pero di ba ang ga control sa BPI si Lucio Tan man? Sa San Miguel kay si Conjuangco ug ang Phlippine government?
Originally Posted by dagget
WOW! Imagine ha, shareholder na sila. Tsk tsk tsk.Originally Posted by dagget
@dagget..naa kay proyba ana bai?
Asa ka ani sa duha part?
1. Naa kay latest cellphones and cars pero wala kay chance nga maka-anak(in the moral sense).......
2. Pwede ka makabuhat ug kaugalingon nga family.....have a chance to get rich and have those latest phones, cars etc..........
Gi angay ra ta tanan sa Ginoo uy.......if you think ang kalipay sa mga priests and nuns are the latest cellphones and cars (which I find ridiculous)......pasigdii nalang, think of it as reward para sa ilahang profession(again...kamo kunoy naa sa ilang lugar be, ganahan ba mo with all those latest cellphones and cars)......total naa man pud ka imong lingaw which is ang imong family ug freedom to do whatever you want with your life........Ang tawo man gud dili makontento......gusto iyahon tanan......
Pero I agree nga businesses should be taxed, regardless of who owns it para fair...........Pero kanang collection sa church dili nalang ta na hilabtan kay mahulog ra baya na nga donation............Alangan, ikaw pay mo donate, ikaw pay taxan.......sobra na sad na di ba?
Originally Posted by fingolfin
you can get hold of the annual report of bpi bank and san miguel corporation.... its listed there who are the major stock holders of the company...Originally Posted by tolstoi
kanang ayala corporation naa pud share ang archdioses of manila ana....
So unsa diay problema ana kung naa silay share? Mas maayo nuon di ba? Ang topic man gud is:
"Impose taxes to church owned business:yes or no?
Pero nganong gi question man ni ang shares of stock? Wala ba diay ga bayad ug tax ang BPI ug San Miguel? Or, wala ba ga bayad ang Archdiocese of Manila from the profit they got out of the stock? Unsa man diay jud issue aning BPI ug San Miguel? Or wala lang jud ni siyay issue, mura ug FYI lang ba nga ang Arch..of Manila naay shares of stock......Actually ga libog ko kung unsay issue ani against the church....
Kung akoang i connect ang topic, archdiocese of manila ug ang shares of stock kay ingon ani ang resulta ay:
Taxan jud nato ang church cause the archdiocese of Manila owns shares of stock sa San Miguel ug BPI..............Does that make sense?
Originally Posted by dagget
Similar Threads |
|