advice: pwede makiha ang biological father sa ako baby who is neglecting his duties??

[boliklik]

---

the only solution 2 ur problem s 2 kick him out! sagabal ra na cya sa improvement
focus nlng on ur baby, u won't be able to properly care for ur kid f ur heart s full of hatred, mkaya ra na nmo dai w/ the help of family and good friends

ako btaw I have 4 kids and nakaya raman lagi nko

[jntio]

pgka wla pd bili ana imo partner ts oi. palayasa na oi

[baning]

im also wondering why you're still with him despite all you said about him...

go on with your life sis.. wala kay makuha ana niya.. you can't sue him nor force him to give your kid his support... you will just be wasting your time...


bye bye nalang ana niya para mahuman tanan.. and start a new beginning with your kid...

[reginakrys]

about sa third party, you can't sue him kay dli man mo married.. wla moy legal contract whatsoever binding him to you..

regarding sa child support, naa kay mapakita nga document nga gi-angkon niya ang inyong baby? but even if naa, i think sakto ang uban posts nga i-focus nlng imong time and money sa imong child, rather than waste it trying to get something from him..

[KASAAC]

Dili mo legally married pero naa mo anak... I think naa kay ma apas sa imung ka live-in ana gurly...

So nahulog nga illegitimate ang baby...

As per this article: FAQ on Civil Registration: Births - source

Who are considered illegitimate children?

The following are illegitimate children :
Children born to couples who are not legally married or of common-law marriages; -mao ni inyu case
Children born of incestuous marriages;
Children born of bigamous marriages;
Children born of adulterous relations between parents;
Children born of marriages void for reason of public policy under Art. 38 of the Family Code;
Children born of couples below 18, whether they are married (which married is void) or not; and,
Children born of other void marriages under Art. 15 unless otherwise provided. (OCRG Cir. No. 89-13 dated July 17, 1989)


What are the rights of legitimate children?

Legitimate children shall have the right :
To bear the surnames of the father and the mother:
To receive support from them, from their ascendants, and in a proper case, from their brothers and sisters, in conformity with article 291 and,
To the legitimate and other successional rights which this Code recognise in their favor. (Art. 263, Civil Code of the Philippines)


Here's more:

Section 8. Rights Of Illegitimate Children

Art. 840. When the testator leaves legitimate children or descendants, and natural children, legally acknowledged, each of the latter shall have a right to one-half of the portion pertaining to each of the legitimate children who have not received any betterment, provided it can be included in the third which may be freely disposed of, from which it must be taken, after the burial and funeral expenses have been deducted.

The legitimate children may pay the portion pertaining to the natural ones in cash, or in other property of the estate, according to just rules.

Art. 841. Should the testator not leave any legitimate children or descendants, but legitimate ascendants, the acknowledged natural children shall have a right to one-half of the part of the estate which can be freely disposed of by the testator.

This is understood without prejudice to the legal portion of the surviving spouse, in accordance with article 836; so that when the spouse survives with acknowledged natural children, what may be lacking to make up their legal portion shall be awarded to them as a naked property right during the life of the spouse.

Art. 842. When the testator leaves no legitimate descendants or ascendants, the acknowledged natural children shall be entitled to a third of the inheritance.

Art. 843. The rights granted natural children by the foregoing article are transmitted on their death to their legitimate descendants.

Art. 844. The hereditary portion of children legitimized by royal concession shall be equal to that established by law in favor of acknowledged natural children.

Art. 845. Illegitimate children who have not the character of natural children shall be entitled to support only.

The obligation of the person who is to support them shall be transmitted to his or her heirs, and shall continue until said children attain their majority, and in case they should be incapacitated, while the incapacity lasts.


...to legalized everything consult a lawyer for proper guidance and appropriate actions, goodluck sis

[Snowfly]

If you Love him,,,,then you will be able to accept everything. If you don't ,then whats the use of living together and suffer more? You are supporting your baby and him pa gyud and naka dare pa gyud ug pangita ug lain?? Gosh,,,you are just prolonging your agony my dear.

Junk him,he is not worth your worries,,filing a case is of no use if he has no work or a permanent job. You better focus w/ your child and your job.....one day, when he has already matured, he will realize everything and beg for you to come back. Thats human nature,,,,ganahan mo gukod kon naay magpa dili dili hehehe

[rr_sipat]

sory to say, naa jud ing ana nga tawo... wala tay mahems palami ra na iya

maning kamot nalang jud!

[meg.nardo]

if you think burden siya sa imo then let go of him. Ayaw pag usik sa imong oras ug panahon para niya kay mosamot nga wa kai mahimo nga makaayo sa imong kinabuhi ug sa imong baby. bata paka ug daghan pang kaayohan ang nagpaabot sa imo in the future. Di pa ulahi ang tanan. Ayaw nalang file ug case, kay mogara hinoon ug samot ang lalake. It only shows nga totally depedent ra gyud ka niya ug wa kai mahimo kung wa siya. mura na hinoon ug desperada ang imong dating sa iyaha. Kung na ipon mo, ayaw na paghuwat nga siya pa ang molayas. Samtang sayo pa lakaw na ug pahawa na diha sa imong gipuy-an. Ipakita sa iya nga you can stand alone without him and that's a very brave move on your part.

Now, the big question here is " KAYA MO BA? "

[yanyan82]

kung gi acknowledge sa lalaki ang bata, pwede ka makahabol. pero kapoy pd kay ikaw permi magpa summon nya sa court. ang babae permi luoy... ako palang no, ako nalang na biyaan uy. kalas oras cge gukod uroy.

[likyam]

case end point: nangahitabo na tanan because sa ka imoral sa mga tawo ron. forgive me for being harsh noh pero that is the appropriate term man gud sa nahitabo ron sa society.

given naman na ang love, pero it doesn't have to conform to having sexual intimacy just to show na love ninyo ang usag usa. wala na dyud ang time na naai self control both side sa genders. everything goes naman gud ron. in the long run, ang bunga sa gibuhat ang mag suffer.

mao na magdahom pa mo nganong rampant ron ang immoralidad and illiteracy ron sa ato society? pareha ra gud na sa panahon sa bibliya: sa panahon ni moses na himo nang balaod ang divorce because the people wouldn't listen to God's law and commandment. and because God is patient, He tolerated it.

Pero in the end one man's life sad, victory is still with the Lord. adto ra ta i judge tanan.

It's not too late to change. instead of following other's footsteps, kabalo man tang sayop na o gidili kita na ta magkusa na dili buhaton. di ba?

as to your case TS, maapas nimo ang laki ug giangkon niya ang imo anak by putting his name at the birth certificate of the child when he/she was born. it would only mean a responsibility on his part. giangkon gud, so iyaha gyud. and most of them are right. why would you sacrifice the future of your child by still living with the guy when you know you don't have a future with him?

love is divine and powerful, but still necessity comes first. di na practical ron ang gugma unahon.