hahaha
nalingaw ko sa notion na "nikon takes better pic than canon"
Results 21 to 30 of 63
Thread: Nikon DSLR vs. Canon DSLR
-
10-17-2009, 01:28 PM #21Elite Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,664
-
10-17-2009, 02:18 PM #22C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 7,049
Keep in mind the OP said "in my experience".
Originally Posted by arisarnado
hahaha nalingaw ko sa notion na "nikon takes better pic than canon"
By the way, does anybody love Pentax/Sony here?
-
10-17-2009, 03:23 PM #23Elite Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,664
ok unta sony pero problem lang is mahal ra kaayo xa. pentax is nice pud.
then murag magkaproblema na ang sony if high ISOs na. noisy ra kaayo xa.
when it comes to buying SLRs man gud, you also need to consider the accessories (and lens) that
you will also purchase in the future. kasagaran man gud diri sa cebu kay nikon or canon.
but nonetheless, they are good SLRs
-
10-17-2009, 03:35 PM #24Elite Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,835
naa nasad ni.. heheh.. kapila nman ni nga attempt? hehe
@TS
i think the reason ngano wala ka naka kita pag search nimo ang ing-ani nga thread k gi-close sa admin.. hehe
-
10-17-2009, 08:10 PM #25Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Gender
- Posts
- 633
blah blah blah in my experience Nikon is the best..
blah blah blah in my experience Canon is the best..
blah blah blah in my experience Brand X is the best..
gipang bayran mo sa mga companiya para mamaligya sa ilang camera? hahahaha peace!
-
10-17-2009, 08:30 PM #26Elite Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,518
never ending story...
parang telenovela lang na walang katapusan...
most of the photography book I'd read never state what brand they use, instead they inform the readers about what type of camera they use for the shot...
ex.
35mm SLR, 85mm lens, 1/4 f2.8 ISO 100 film or
DSLR 17-35mm lens at 35mm, 1/10 f3.5, 200 ISO
the author/photographer never mention brands but settings...
you will never get the best skintones in brands, you will never get a sharp image in brands, you will never get a best shot with brand names.... but you can capture moments with camera and never with a brand name...
I suggest to the MODS lock this thread cos this will be another senseless topic...
if viewers would like to compare camera and view reviews pls go to the thread DSLR Talks. more info and less flames.
https://www.istorya.net/forums/photog...talks-548.html
cheers!
-
10-17-2009, 08:40 PM #27Elite Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,495
when will this ever end? hehehe Originally Posted by KE-25
actually both brands are good and trusted. your decision would be mostly on preference..
-
10-17-2009, 08:45 PM #28Elite Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,835
plus one to you fafi! Originally Posted by dj-dark
-
10-17-2009, 08:50 PM #29Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Gender
- Posts
- 466
Most of the reviews that I've read say that Canon takes better photos than Nikon.
Canon takes sharper images, has more details, well-balanced colour, etc.
I read somewhere that Nikon's photos are a bit "saturated." This might perhaps be the reason why other people are saying that Nikon takes better photos.
-
10-17-2009, 09:14 PM #30Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Gender
- Posts
- 633
Well said!! Originally Posted by dj-dark
Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|