para sa akoa lang, wala'y naghimo sa Ginoo. ang idea ka'y dapat naa ju'y uncaused cause di ba kay kung wala'y uncaused cause o first cause, wala unta'y effect. sa ako'ng pagsabot, kini'ng uncaused cause ni-fit ni siya sa description nga God, kay only a being as a God naa'y ingun ana nga essence og power.
para nako sab, sakto nga complex ang universe kay daghan siya elements og parts. pero si God dili man tingali siya complex kay "spirit" man siya o "mind", wala siya'y physical parts. so in essence simple ra kaayo siya. ang complex siguro sa iya is the way he thinks.
basin ra man kaha? we leave that to speculation. i told hell nga urbanist ko. perhaps i should also tell blue, that im an urbanist, im telling you now, im an urbanist, or you could tell blue im really an urbanist, convince him i am.
dont trust what you hear from people, talks deceive.OT na pud ta ani. i dont understand you guys, is a fuss needed to for that? im an urbanist. Bow*
i saw you though one time, when i was visiting someone in CAFA, you were doing your psych lecture.
i said, i dont teach logic. I'm an urbanist, maniwala ka ni mr. blue he mistook me for another person.
but this is totally out of the point, im still saying, that aquinas is invalidated by the moderns.
mao gsaway gyud na sa usa sa among maestro c aquinas kay out.dated na kuno kaayo na hehehe
Similar Threads |
|