Originally Posted by Poor_Prince23
You are Right on the mark......
We tried that before..... Lets not try it again..... We will only get the same result if we do that again...
Originally Posted by Poor_Prince23
You are Right on the mark......
We tried that before..... Lets not try it again..... We will only get the same result if we do that again...
Ayay... murag ang mentality ng mga tawo ay justifiable evidence for treason naman...
What we do in life echoes throughout eternity~ Please support your lokal artists and their efforts to promote the Cebuano identity and culture!
These 3 countries are not interested anymore sa Philippines. South Korea nalang kay mao ra man sila ang interesado. Wow, Cebu- South Korea. Yepeee :mrgreen:Originally Posted by LytSlpr
Originally Posted by diemjudilla
REad history please...
George Washington and Thomas Jeferson were called traitors and charged with treason......
when they signed the declaration of independence.....
hala mu mga koreans raba ang brutal kaayo diri sa pilipinas pag world war 2, dili ang mga hapon. mga koreans ang mu ihaw sa mga pinoy kani adto. nagtuo ang mga pinoy nga mga hapon to tanan pero ang truth daghan diay nga koreano adto unya maoy maldito kaayo. pero basin taga north korea toÂ*basin good ang taga south
this is a crazy planets!!!Â*
question is, would anybody actually buy us?
of course they won't. why should they buy us when they can already get what they want from us *without* buying us. that and be spared from the liabilities of holding on to a colony?Â* cheap labor, cheap raw materials, dumping ground for excess products... you name it.
review your Constantino history, ladies and gentlepeople. we were granted independence in 1946 precisely because holding on to colonies at that time (until present) is a taxing work. it's liabilities outweigh its advantages. besides it looks good to the international community. but the ties that bind are there. ever heard of the grand debate on parity rights, or how former president Garcia lost US support because of his 'Filipino-first policy'?
welcome to Neocolonialism.
sell the country to the Koreans or the Americans or whatelse? pffft... they dont need to buys us. they can already do what the want without buying us.
“What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we cant decipher. What we can't understand we call nonsense. What we can't read we call gibberish.” - Chuck Palahniuk
thats the spirit of free trade bai Gareb..even the land of MAO embraces itÂ*
pila man sad ang presyo sa Cebu kung ibaligya nimu?
Originally Posted by tolstoi
there is nothing here of 'free trade'. there is everthing here of economic domination.
and we wonder why we are poor. tsk.
“What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we cant decipher. What we can't understand we call nonsense. What we can't read we call gibberish.” - Chuck Palahniuk
let's find out first what the law states about this matter before we get into a conclusion..
General Rule – only Filipino citizens and corporations at least sixty percent of the capital of which is owned by Filipino are entitled to acquire and own land in the Philippines.
Exceptions is allowed in the following cases:
a) Acquisition before the 1935 Constitution;
b) Acquisition thru hereditary succession if the alien acquires is a legal heir.
c) Purchase of not more than forty percent interest in a condominium project.
d) Purchase by former natural-born Filipino citizens subject to the limitations prescribed by R.A. 9225).
3. A Filipino who marries an alien retains her Philippine citizenship (unless by her act or omission she is deemed to have renounced Philippine citizenship), and may therefore acquire real estate in the Philippines.
http://propertiesmla.tripod.com/id6.html
Similar Threads |
|