no full frontal nudity... bati...
yeah... whats the point? read it for the articles? go online na lang!
No you have to see the First Issue - Frontal nudity -> *****hano hehe
hahahahaha... centerfold siya broOriginally Posted by Rance
![]()
![]()
babagan man daw ni
^
ni kinsa daw? sa FHM ug Maxim? heheh
awWWw kinsa pa man diay ang Simbahan og mga religious groups... Babagan man gani ang Condom og Pills, kana paba hinuon....
mao! kay makadako pa kuno ug biga ang playboy! pastilan oi! naay internet! di ka compare ang magazines!!!
Gibabagan ni Archbishop Oscar Cruz and other conservative anti-pornography groups ang kining pag release sa 1st issue of Playboy Phils. They are even thinking of filing anti-pornography charges against the mag. well, "pulpit and bible bashing" that is...i'm a devout Catholic but i hate it when some of our flock tries to persuade or insist their supposedly "perfect and supreme" morality over others and even in the affairs of the State...
Playboy Phils. did not budge coz their argument was that Playboy is not a porn magazine. good move! ug tinuod sab btaw...it's more of an art form (for adults).
besides, nobody has moral authority over the State affairs but the State itself, not the Church...again this is an issue of SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. It is in the same breadth that the Church can't and shouldn't stop the legalization of condoms and their condom advertising.
Playboy, FHM, and condoms are every adult citizen's right to buy them in a democratic country...we are not living in a theocratic government like Vatican.
dapat lang ni babagan og protestahan kay tungod nga wala'y full frontal nudity...
Similar Threads |
|