Snape did non verbal spells.
Well snapes pretty powerful himself, and i think avada kedavra is an exception...
tnx bro!
the thing is, they setted this up in book 6, but we never get to see this stuff payoff in book 7, seeing this is the final book and the anticipation surrounding it, also, being the final book, it could have no holds barred explored this issue.Originally Posted by diatabz
yeah, snape is more powerful than voldemort...
because of loooove.......
I dont think she was dying to finish the book, she kept saying she had already written the ENDING of the book so there really was no dying for her to finish anything.Originally Posted by khent08
well id have to agree that JK was a lil scrimpy when it came to the fight scenes, but nevertheless, Deathly Hallows answered so many questions for me, and was a blast to read...
Sweet Ginny Weasley has finally snagged the ever elusive bachelor in the wizard world. Ha! Eat that Cho Chang!
i agree that the part where ron did parseltongue was lameeeeee!!!!
Done with the book... Very nice![]()
Although I agree with you guys, there were a lot of loopholes. I found some parts really lame also... like how Ravenclaw's diadem was destroyed... it was supposed to be destroyed by something really powerful like the basilisk fangs. Now, crabbe's doing a fire charm (Fiendfyre) that could destory a hocrux that Hermione doesn't know, wth?!... If I remember clearly, it was said in the beginning part that Hermione summoned some books from Dumbledore's office including that Dark Arts book that was supposed to contain stuff about the darkest dark magic... I guess she must've missed that part... the part where the fire charm that could destroy a hocrux was stated...
Don't you think it's impossible that Hermione didnt research about that spell when she knew that it could destroy a Hocrux in the first place? I guess voldemort wanted his death eater hogwarts teacher (the Carrows) to teach that certain dark magic to the hogwarts children like crabbe.. and bring forth the destruction of his own hocrux.hahaha!
Oh wait, Hermione knows about the fiendfyre from the beginning. After everythin they went through, almost getting killed, people dying, and she can't dare use that charm, saying how dangerous it was, to destroy the locket, the cup, etc... hmmm...“It must have been Fiendfyre!” whimpered Hermione, her eyes on the broken piece.
“Sorry?”
“Fiendfyre – cursed fire – it’s one of the substances that destroy Horcruxes, but I would
never, ever have dared use it, it’s so dangerous – how did Crabbe know how to – ?”
“Must’ve learned from the Carrows,” said Harry grimly.The book should have explained how dangerous it was. Coz at this stage of the story, what charm could've been more dangerous than facing Lord Voldemort himself and be in the brink of death?
sorry im ranting... hehe. Anyway, I still enjoyed the book though...![]()

book 1 quidditch match? muttering counter curses against quirrel? i dont think non verbal 2 sya. but if non verbal means wandless magic...then i guess it was a non verbal spell.Originally Posted by vanceloma2nd
anyway, i loved the book...too bad nahuman na jud![]()
Similar Threads |
|