vern kay valyeen. joke!
if ugaling magkatapok ang mga mods and admin, pwede pahibalu-on mi.
para makakita pud ko ninyo in person, makapasalamat ba.
SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 - we have our share of arguments before. but it was a constructive argumentdba springy? hehehe
KE-25 - a down to earth guy. walay libog.
^^Maldito ... are you insinuating here that what the good ol' Doc is saying is all who have posted their evaluations out in the open are all lying??
You got some balls, dude... He's a manager -- he knows what he's sayin'!
No, I was just merely asking a question.
and even if he's the president of the Philippines, in here is still just a member just like me.
and I should be the one asking him about his balls calling me a dishonest man in behalf of the posters here who was honest.
and I posted this by the way.
it's criticizing the way they close threads. so yeah... I'm included in the dishonest generalization theory. I was just implying that his perception about people are highly subjective.![]()
but this is all about forum moderators and not a company workers. Just expressing my thoughts.hehe
naa pud kay punto bay.
ani na lang, hunahuna-a nga bisita ka diri sa istorya.net
dili ni imong lugar
ang moral lesson:
magbaton ta ug pamatasan
kanang pleasant para sa tanan
what i like most of this was the idea of evaluating mods...who has the right and who are qualified diba. thats nice. coz there are mods that are just brutal and they think they have you in their palm of their hands... much better to eval mods so for the others that are deserving they have to be recognized and the rest should be stripped of their capabilities that they use to abuse and harass others.
i diss those mods that are too way above their heads. Its just showing what kind of person they are.
my suggestion also if there are members that needs to have infraction we have to request and deliberate before giving an infraction. There should be a consulting body to decide and for the member also to defend his or her side.
lastly, arguments should not be posted anywhere in the site. kai murag nagpakita ra nga na hugaw na ang site nato. also, that makes them earn points and be a senior or CIA *lol. so we have to have this section to discuss,argue and debate things...hindi kung saan saan lang. hope they should receive 3 warnings posting arguments everywhere on the site and giving infraction after the 3rd offense (both of them)
so i guess this would make istoryans disciplined nga dile lang mag pataka lalis bisan asa.ma hugaw na nuon ato site because of those arguments lang...
thanxsana disiplinado ra ta tanan
![]()
Similar Threads |
|