S*x, Best for Health?

[adie0525]

---

hahahahha..naa jud basis oh..so bottom line..dili na xa bad..tama ba?

[rodsky]

hahahahha..naa jud basis oh..so bottom line..dili na xa bad..tama ba?

People seem to mistake ***--which is a straightforward practical (reproductive function of all living things) and biological act--with issues of morality which is within the social/ethical/religious realm of things. So I basically urge the individuals here who keep on talking about marriage or adultery to please try and be more rational and/or logical with your posts--the issue here is the act of *** itself--let us all leave morality out of the door.

-RODION

[erichoy]

Kung suko dyud si Papa Jesus ana...nag apil unta cya'g labay ug bato kang Mary Magdalene.

-RODION

dba ana man c GOD nga go to the world and multipl.. so ok ranang *** but one thing man gud ang *** ron is g himo na bsan d pa kasal.. dako bya nag sala dba?? in short premarital ***...

[rodsky]

dba ana man c GOD nga go to the world and multipl.. so ok ranang *** but one thing man gud ang *** ron is g himo na bsan d pa kasal.. dako bya nag sala dba?? in short premarital ***...

Please read my previous post--this is not a topic about morality. I firmly believe that the intent of this thread was a rational, and scientific inquiry into the biological effects of the *** act on health, which IS a biological issue. So there is little or no room for a debate on morality--it will just muddle up the issue. Thank you.

-RODION

[erichoy]

ok.. sori gud.. hehehehee.... exercise man japon na xa.. kay ka kapoy ra cgeg atras abanti ahh.. hehehe

[kat2x]

up lng ko for best exercise

[adie0525]

People seem to mistake ***--which is a straightforward practical (reproductive function of all living things) and biological act--with issues of morality which is within the social/ethical/religious realm of things. So I basically urge the individuals here who keep on talking about marriage or adultery to please try and be more rational and/or logical with your posts--the issue here is the act of *** itself--leave morality out of the door please.

-RODION

nanu akoa man imo gqoute bro? wa man q mquestion about it being bad or good morally.. ingon ko na dili xa bad=for the health..which this thread is all about

[rodsky]

This is from wikipedia:

an exerpt from the topic "orgasm"


Orgasm and health

Orgasm, and indeed *** as a whole, are physical activities that can require exertion of many major bodily systems. A 1997 study in the British Medical Journal[33] based upon 918 men age 45-59 found that after a ten year follow-up, men who had fewer orgasms were twice as likely to die of any cause as those having two or more orgasms a week. A follow-up in 2001 which focused more specifically on cardiovascular health found that having *** three or more times a week was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of heart attack or stroke. (Note that as a rule, correlation does not imply causation).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm

-RODION[br]Posted on: February 10, 2008, 05:57:57 PM_________________________________________________

nanu akoa man imo gqoute bro? wa man q mquestion about it being bad or good morally.. ingon ko na dili xa bad=for the health..which this thread is all about

Why are you assuming you were the one being quoted? Anyways, my statement was a general remark sparked by erichoy's post. If you feel you were the target and you felt offended, then I offer my apologies. But still, I do wonder why you felt targeted by my post.

-RODION

[erichoy]

ayaw na gud mo pag away.. hehehe.. BASTA LAMI NA XA.. ahahaha

[adie0525]

ako na nuun assuming..look at reply 68 bro..kung mopost ka make sure kaya nimo panindigan hap!