FREE MASONRY - the Principles

[mannyamador]

---

"The nature of Anti-Masonry is the same today as it ever was: fear and hatred based on ignorance and intolerance with millennial and conspiracy paranoia." - Ben Hoff Highland Park Lodge #240 (New Jersey, USA)

Said as only a lying freemason could have said it! Albert Pike was, at least, more honest.

[Desert Father]

Every time a secret of a Freemason would be exposed, their natural reaction is to deny it.Â* They still want us to believe that what we know is not correct but of course they know that that was their secret unraveled.Â*

Freemasonry is a religion, no doubt. They profess something about God which is unique.Â* Not Christian.Â* When they meet, their conversation always talk about religion.

[dongi]

unya pde ta kaapil ani....unsaon man pag apil..

[blackwidow]

Have you heard of Gabriel Jogand-Pagès, better known as LEO TAXIL? Here's a little something of who he is. And for everybody else who are willing to learn more about this just click on the site or sites I have posted below.

" Taxil ADMITTED he had written Â*as the work of "Albert Pike, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, Instructions to the twenty-three Supreme Councils of the World, July 14,1889."

http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-mason...masonry06.html

Hhmm.."written AS THE WORK OF ....." do take notice of the phrase.

Am I getting this right?!?!?! Somebody actually used ALBERT PIKE's name? Or am I just KIDDING MYSELF?!?!?!
Yeah, Albert Pike was honest (of course! He was a Mason!) But sadly, not LEO TAXIL until his admission.

http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/taxi...ed.html#letter

Lastly,

"It is a sad commentary on the intellectual integrity of Freemasonry's enemies that they continue to regurgitate Taxil's hoax with such zeal. A bibliography of anti-Masonic uses of this hoax is appended to this translation together with a bibliography of explanations of how Taxil duped the enemies of Masonry. "

S. Brent Morris
Editor, Heredom

[blackwidow]

Have you heard of Gabriel Jogand-Pagès, better known as LEO TAXIL? Here's a little something of who he is. And for everybody else who are willing to learn more about this just click on the site or sites I have posted below.

" Taxil ADMITTED he had written Â*as the work of "Albert Pike, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, Instructions to the twenty-three Supreme Councils of the World, July 14,1889."

http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-mason...masonry06.html

Hhmm.."written AS THE WORK OF ....." do take notice of the phrase.

Am I getting this right?!?!?! Somebody actually used ALBERT PIKE's name? Or am I just KIDDING MYSELF?!?!?!
Yeah, Albert Pike was honest (of course! He was a Mason!) But sadly, not LEO TAXIL until his admission.

http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/taxi...ed.html#letter

Lastly,

"It is a sad commentary on the intellectual integrity of Freemasonry's enemies that they continue to regurgitate Taxil's hoax with such zeal. A bibliography of anti-Masonic uses of this hoax is appended to this translation together with a bibliography of explanations of how Taxil duped the enemies of Masonry. "

S. Brent Morris
Editor, Heredom

http://altreligion.about.com/library...ssiontaxil.htm

[blackwidow]

Goodnight, sleep loose.

[mannyamador]

" Taxil ADMITTED he had written as the work of "Albert Pike, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, Instructions to the twenty-three Supreme Councils of the World, July 14,1889."

Snore... old news! This post conveniently ignores the fact that Albert Pike wrote quite a number of documents, not all of which can be attirbuted to the Leo Taxil hoax. All these attempts to deny the teachings of freemasonry (which are incompatible with Christianity) are looking even more DESPERATE as time goes on!

By the way, the Leo Taxil hoax is boring, irrelevant stuff. it's even in the Catholic Encyclopedia (published in the 1920s), which shows that the Church ALREADY knew of this hoax and its IRRELEVANCE as far as the incompatibility of freemasonry and Christianity is concerned.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07698b.htm
Of a different type is the most notorious imposture of modern times, that of "Léo Taxil" and "Diana. Vaughan".
Léo Taxil, whose true name was G. Jogand-Pagès, had long been known as one of the most blasphemous and
obscene of the anti-clerical writers in France. He had been repeatedly sentenced to fines and imprisonment for
the filthy and libellous works he published. For example, on account of his atrocious book "Les Amours de Pie IX"
he was sentenced to pay 60,000 francs at the suit of the pope's nephew. He had also founded the "Anti-Clerical",
a journal which fanatically attacked all revelation and religion. In 1885 it was announced that Léo Taxil had been
converted, and he soon proceeded to publish a series of pretended exposures of the practices of Freemasonry,
and particularly of the "Satanisme" or Devil-worship with which he declared it was intimately bound up. Amongst
other attractions he introduced a certain "Diana Vaughan", the heroine of "Palladism", who was destined to be
the spouse of the demon Asmodeus, but clung to virtue, and was constantly visited by angels and devils. Various
other writers, Bataille, Margiotta, Hacks, etc., exploited the same ideas and became in a measure Taxil's confederates.
In 1896-1897 the imposture was finally shown up and Taxil cynically admitted that Diana Vaughan was only the name
of his typist. [See Portalié, "La Fin d'une mystification", Paris, 1897, and H. Gruber (H. Gerber), "Leo Taxils
Palladismus Roman", and other works, 1897-8.]

Why not just ask your superiors about indifferentism? Ask them: does freemasonry believe that ALL religions are EQUALLYT pleasing to God?

[BaDBoY]

bitaw, hangtud karon nag paabot jud ko sa tubag ani nga pangutana:Â* "does freemasonry believe that ALL religions are EQUALLY pleasing to God?" mao ra gyud ni ang maka sulbad sa question about INDIFFERENTISM.

hinaut unta nga matubag na ni...

[Archer sensAtion]

unsa man diay ang pleasing to God nga religion ang Roman Catholic ra...

[mannyamador]

unsa man diay ang pleasing to God nga religion ang Roman Catholic ra...

The Catholic Faith is the True Faith. But that's beside the point. WHATEVER religion you belong to, it is still illogical to believe that all reglions are equally pleasing to God (indifferentism).