@tolstoi ... Drafting a law out of convenience is by no means a solution to anything. A law that violates due process is not a law that will ever bear fruit. It might serve as a warning, an ultimatum, maybe even as a temporary solution ... but the constitution does not serve to make statements with action no matter how "evident" it might be.
@uzumaki ... I understand people will feel differently when they've had first hand experience. But that is all irrelevant to the FACT that the LAW must be followed above all else. There cannot be any exceptions. You say we should remind these criminals that we are a sovereign people ... how should that be done? By taking their rights as a citizen of the country? Should we show these criminals that we are sovereign(self-governing, independent) by breaking the very laws that we create? They may be criminals ... but they have rights just like you and I.
The whole argument in favor of these death squads seem to hinge on human judgement that these men in these squads be able to judge between good and bad, that they are endowed with "common sense", that they be able to realize when things are "evident". Do we have to be reminded by history time and time again how men with all the credentials in the world can possess poor judgement? The justice system was made in-part to avoid this. Argue all you want, but until there are men that exist, who cannot be corrupted by power and by themselves ... a self serving death squad is the WRONG solution to a BIG problem.




Reply With Quote

