ATHIESM Has a Sympathy of EVIL is it true?

[kebotDiNaMute]

ang tan-aw nako ani ang pasabot sa osa kay Na proven na sa science nga naay Utok. kang pein kay, lahi pod, kong wala niya makita dili siya motoo, nya he used the utok argument nga sigoro mental lapses wala siya ka getz nga ang utok na proven by science nga ni exist.

Do you not know na gi qoute ra ni pein ang utok ni hudas? that means if nag binogo si pain to na to see is to believe... then guess whos mouth is that comming from? hehehe! from the horse? hmmmm.

[Malic]

Do you not know na gi qoute ra ni pein ang utok ni hudas? that means if nag binogo si pain to na to see is to believe... then guess whos mouth is that comming from? hehehe! from the horse? hmmmm.

wala diay ka kasabot nga sayop ang analogy ni pein? ang utok na proven na nga ni exsit by science. ang Ginoo wala pa. mao na ang thread nga ilang gisobay.

[kebotDiNaMute]

wala diay ka kasabot nga sayop ang analogy ni pein? ang utok na proven na nga ni exsit by science. ang Ginoo wala pa. mao na ang thread nga ilang gisobay.

waaa... hehehe, well im focus on hudas, you are focus on pein.. hahaha thats how battle makes his advantage and disadvantage... lets c where this goes...

[amingb]

Dili mo tuo a Ginoo pero motuo ni Satanas .... its a sympathy to the devil ..

Para fair dili mo tuo sa duha ...

[Malic]

waaa... hehehe, well im focus on hudas, you are focus on pein.. hahaha thats how battle makes his advantage and disadvantage... lets c where this goes...

sorry kebs, i take no side. well,what else is new, you are used of following the blind.

[fingolfin]

.. ok.. you guys must really stop this. Focus on the topic at hand - atheism. Not the analogy of each and everyone. This is getting too personal between you people. If you won't stop with all these personal taunts, then think of a new username. This ain't a warning. I'm telling you.....

[d'nameless_shameless]

apil-apil ko ha...


ATHEISM has a sympathy of evil, is it true?

Nohhh....

I think ang naa sa logic "nga atheism is evil" is kay sa ilang tan-aw there is just no reason for atheist to do good and lovely things because there is no "BOSS" telling them to do so. And sa tan-aw sad nila they can just hurt anybody they hated kay there's no God who tell them not to, di ba?

But mind you I am sure there are many atheists who did tremendous contributions to our world, without any verses from the bible.

I've known some atheists who are just lovely as christians.

I'm not an Atheist, I'm a Christian by the way.

GOD BLESS TO ALL...

[acegear]

di na sila evil miss understood lang there are still bound to the goverment laws so dili pud na sila pataka himo og binoang.

[cromagnon]

evil lies in superstion , believing on god is like believe devils. mao religionist moy naay sympathy sa evil .

athiest doesn giv a shit on satan nor god.

[Tirong-say]

It is quite difficult to conclude that atheism do really have sympathy towards the devil, perhaps I could say that they are inclined to do deeds that is inherent with the devil. Man although culpable enough to err and do evil things has it's good side as well, the same like us who possess religion as basis of faith. We have the Holy Bible as our guide in how we would deal with the imperfections in this world, but in other hand atheist as well had human laws that would guide them to deal with this predicament.

But then the psychological impact is there, for in religionist we consider GOD as omnipresent he is there always watching in every deeds that we make, so makes us conscious with our actions always by following his teachings of what is good and what is bad, whereas for the laws of man everyone is dependent with another authorized man to check and enforce the law, which in nature is very limited and if one decides to do bad deeds he has chances that he could get away with the ill deeds un-noticed. Control using a common belief or law is the key to regulate man not to do evil deeds and it is always has been psychological in nature.

Man has a very great sense for self preservation, he has his mind and words to defend itself against anything that he consider harmful to him, so if he is censured with a certain transgression he can devise a lot of deduction to defend itself and could even bend the law of the land if he must just to get away from his misdemeanors, and most of the time in reality he got away. Through this notion as man could perceive that he can manipulate the law of the land, would eventually lead these human laws ineffective in controlling man. In this substance I think the Law of GOD is more substantiated in controlling the bad traits of man.