yeah, i agree with you.Originally Posted by whoopz
 
			
			 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				i bought the 500gig version instead
WD5000aacs
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				hoohhhhhhh....hehehe...kini lageng mga kwartahan...ako tawn,40x2 GB na HDD ra tawn...tsk tsk...nya IDE pjd...wahahahha
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				heheh... gamay rako kwarta bro oi. utang raman ni nako.Originally Posted by parts
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				western digital VS. Seagate
mas prefer kos seagate. kai u know what? dili pwede ma slave ang WD sa lain na HDD. like sa amua. when i tried to borrow WD hd kai mo copy kog movies og music. but dili xa ma detect sa akong computer. i wonder why. Mao d ay kai mag pa master jud d ay ang WD. graveh. that one is a real issue jud. and kung performance? mas labaw ang seagate. i tried a researcdh on that. pinaka accurate ang seagate
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				The hard disk itself is decent. Cache really doesn't matter unless milliseconds matter to you.
You can slave a WD to any brand of hard disk.
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				you can slave a WD to seagateOriginally Posted by vern
NOOOOOTTTTTT!!!! impossible i tried it. insecure guru nang WD sa Seagate. hmmp
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				I have multiple WD HDs as well as Seagate, Maxtor, and Samsung. None of WDs are master. Sounds like a user error and not WD's fault.
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				oh yeah? have u tried a Western Digital Slaved by a Seagate? how bout try this one. find an 80Gb Seagate (mastered on primary slot) then 80Gb Western Digital (Slaved on primary slot.) tell me what happens
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
 Re: is this hardisk upgrade ok?
				Gee, look at this, Seagate master with a WD slave on one of my servers. My apologies for not comparing puny 80GB HDs. I haven't had a hard drive that small since the decade started. Making a generalization about WD when you've only had experience on a limited number of models is pretty bad observation though.
vern@ubuntu:/s/crypt/freenet$ sudo lshw -C disk
[sudo] password for vern:
*-disk
description: SCSI Disk
product: ST3500630A
vendor: ATA
physical id: 2
bus info: scsi@3:0.0.0
logical name: /dev/sdd
version: 3.AA
serial: 9QG61126
size: 465GB
configuration: ansiversion=5
*-disk:0
description: SCSI Disk
product: WD7500AAKS
vendor: ATA
physical id: 0
bus info: scsi@2:0.0.0
logical name: /dev/sdb
version: 17.0
serial: WD-WMA8F1251515
size: 715GB
capabilities: partitioned partitioned:dos
configuration: ansiversion=5
*-disk:1
description: SCSI Disk
product: Maxtor 4A300J0
vendor: ATA
physical id: 1
bus info: scsi@2:0.1.0
logical name: /dev/sdc
version: RAMB
serial: A80WMQEE
size: 279GB
configuration: ansiversion=5
*-disk:2
description: SCSI Disk
product: Maxtor 6B200P0
vendor: ATA
physical id: 0.0.0
bus info: scsi@1:0.0.0
logical name: /dev/sda
version: BAH4
serial: B410KY6H
size: 189GB
configuration: ansiversion=5
*-cdrom
description: DVD reader
product: DVD-ROM LTD163D
vendor: LITEON
physical id: 3
bus info: scsi@3:0.1.0
logical name: /dev/cdrom
logical name: /dev/dvd
logical name: /dev/scd0
logical name: /dev/sr0
version: GHR5
capabilities: removable audio dvd
configuration: ansiversion=5 status=open
| Similar Threads | 
 |