Existed - past tenseOriginally Posted by ej___
![]()
Existed - past tenseOriginally Posted by ej___
![]()
Past tense bro coz physical existence ako pasabot way way back His time.
I feel you bro...Originally Posted by ej___
hehe amen.
Part 2 comin' up.
1. The bible contains scienceOriginally Posted by shimiyu
2. Individual faith or self interest will not fit to the bible
3. Where is Science without God
So the conclusion is that when logic can't be logically demonstrated then God doesn't exist?Originally Posted by shimiyu
Remember there are own logic and generally accepted or proven logic.
Of course its different, faith in logic than faith in God but how come when it can't be demonstrated logically it will lead to conclusion that "God doesn't exist"?
1. Yes, God is the perfect designer. Think of any place where you should put your eyes if you will be given a chance.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. NO its not a designer anymore its a creator because there's watch already. Design is not the completion of everything its must be executed or performed.
3. So will it means Atheist ignore God totally? Atheist in there dying days or downfall blame or call God.
4. How come when atheist can't find a watch in the forest it will lead to a conclusion that there's no God?
it goes like this, some will say "I have no salt" thus it means salt doesn't exist?
The fact that you don't have salt it lead us that there's salt. When someone says "there's no God" the more that there's God but the absolute fact is that God is not with you or within you.
1. Christians are blind in doing fleshly things, Christians are blind in reason, intelligence and logic of earthly things.Originally Posted by shimiyu
Christians see's which is not commonly seen by non-believers.
2. God can't be seen in naked eyes (the totality of God).
1. reasoning without basis is flawed. came from own interpretation is flawed.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. Everything is worth to challenge. and everything is worth to be tested and proved.
3. God doesn't exist to everybody, He only existed to those people who has clear and open mind about His will.
1. Personal or own experience is not enough to be accepted, evidence can explain everything (spiritual and physical).Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. Then we should be specific, what type of facts?
3. God is not a rule that must be accepted or God is not a must. He gave us free will to decide.
The great truth is, God is not in all individual.
1. Really? what kind of proof? physical or spiritual?Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. People directly conclude that there's no God because of there limitations.
They conclude that there's no God because they want proof that they like, I mean, they don't accept evidence because for them its their choice, These kind of people denying God are people keep on asking why others have and why they don't have.
1. He exist, but the fact is that you don't like His existence.Originally Posted by shimiyu
Keep on complaining and keep on blaming God because you didn't received what your asking and you don't like what things happened.
2. Some people don't or didn't believed God because they want to escape following the Good Law.
Like its prohibited to have another wife (adultery) but they want many woman as possible.
Its better to give than to receive, but some want to have it all (billionaire, trillionaire). Have you heard rich people stopped doing business, as much as they could they want to add their wealth everyday.
3. Its not a righteous conclusion that when someone didn't see God then God doesn't exist. There are requirements how to see God and the fact that you didn't see God then it leads to a righteous conclusion that you don't have the requirements. its like when you didn't passed the examination then its a fact that you don't have the brain to answer the passing score.
1. God is spirit, how could some will ask for a physical evidence. Or asking a physical evidence was just an excuse to deny Him and not to follow Him.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. There's a physical evidence of Gods work and power.
3. For some other's doubt it is not a fact to conclude that there's no God.
1. He already did, He sent prophets, kings , apostles and even His begotten Son. But people still complaining and asking more. Denying what God has sent is the same thing denying Him. What would be His assurance that some will believed on Him when they see Him?Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. He keep on saying and calling us, through the bible (right bible).
3. God is spirit and can't be seen by eyes.
1. Because you're asking too much for you.Originally Posted by shimiyu
You wont die if you dont have millions, playstation 2 and gf.
God knows whats good for us, let us all be thankful for all that we have wether its less or much.
2. Its not a righteous conclusion to conclude that God doesn't exist because the absence of things that you're asking.
1. Then to God be the Glory.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. Then it will lead you to conclusion that everything was in God's hands and money can't saved your life if its your time already. God kill and Heal. People complaint about God because they always look only to this present life (earth), there's a better life for people who believed and followed Him.
3. Then its her time already, God is teaching that all is in His power. Your aunt die doing good or doing bad? then if she died doing good then she will be comforted on judgment day, if not then sorry for her.
4. Death is not a fact to deny God, but rather its a turning fact that there's God who is the owner of everything.
1. Then its God will to give them rest because a better life is waiting after judgment.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. Accident is not a fact to deny Him, but rather a turning point for us to do Good always because we don't know what might happen tomorrow, its not within our control but through God.
1. Then that's the fact. So to you Hell is more realistic than God.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. His love was given when where alive, through His only begotten Son but people love the darkness than the light.
3. God is Just that He will give what is due to you, if you do Good then you will be in heaven then if you do evil then you will be in hell.
1. It doesn't follow that way, When God exist then you have the best chance to be in Heaven and the best chance to do good, its nice to do Good. Evil things are good to flesh like (disco, many *** partner, wine/beer, gamble, luxury and corruption).Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. So you rather be afraid of Hell than God? Hell is the reward for those who deny God, so Hell can be avoided by accepting God and believing on Him without questions and complaint. How come you believed on Hell (by not afraid of it) then rather deny God? all i can see from your statement are excuses. Its like Adam when he eat the forbidden fruit he rather blame God because of the woman that is given to him.
3. Without Hell God still exist.
1. The bible is a complete false to those who hate God, deny God and Love to do Evil.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. Its not just a paper but it contains the word of God for us to have a guide to experience eternal life when we follow God's Law.
3. God exist also for those who didn't know the bible or didn't have a chance to read the bible.
1. Old Testament is for israelites, while NT is for Christians who follows Christ.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. You should know the time frame and to where it is intended before concluding that God doesn't exist through arbitrary passage from OT and NT.
1. who else will say it, no other books claim that the bible is true but rather deny the bible.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. The bible is false for non-believers and deny God.
3. Of course the bible will say it, who do think will say that God exist rather than bible?
4. with your limitations its not enough to conclude that God doesn't exist.
1. The bible was not change but some people make their own version and translation. Try a Greek and Hebrew Interlinear bible so that you will know the exact details of what is written in older version. Don't rely on garbage translation and paraphrase versions.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. What a bold statement came from a conclusive mind and denying the existence of God.
1. its not stuff buts its a Gospel, and Gospel was not just a stuff. Following the Gospel will make us Good.Originally Posted by shimiyu
2. Give some things that is horrible and unloving, please make another thread for this horrible and unloving stuff that he said(according to you). All of Christ words came from God and God is Love.
3. Again with your conclusive mind its not enough to have a fact.
Peace!
@ Shimiyu: nice one. sounds familiar reasons to me, heard those a lot of times already. hehe
kuyawa rc ruman da, point by point naa gyud cya ikatubag. bow nako ani? lol
hahaha easy rcruman, you don't need to defend all of those.
read the bottom of the post.
none bottom last post bro. you got people confused. heheOriginally Posted by shimiyu
Epicurus posed the following problem in the Second Century BCE.
Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot.
Or he can, but does not want to.
Or he cannot, and does not want to.
If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent.
If he can, but does not want to, then he is wicked.
If he neither can, nor wants to, he is both powerless and wicked.
Stinger lang to. Here is the proof of god's non-existence from a web page. Read it through kay ang uban bitaw ninyo tag-as man ug posts unya not a joy to read kay bad grammar.
I'm just posting the link out of respect for the rules.
http://freethought.mbdojo.com/disproof1.html
Similar Threads |
|