The PH Catholic Church's best-kept secrets

[<SMILE>]

Hmmmm,
another ignorant cocktail
that goes with my popcorn,
nice draft with such pointless or rather business like intentions,
I hope that the government will hold all tithes illegal so that
no article such as this would come out,
money is doing so much evil things nowadays.
and people are doing anything just to get what they describe
free money, such hypocrite religious zealots or acting to be religious zealots.

[Bears Grill]

It's been said that, during the Vietnam War, the Vatican didn't protest much against America's use of Napalm. They say that people who grew up in that era joked that if those B-52s were dropping condoms instead of Napalm, the Vatican would've heaped condemnations daily.

Gays in the seminary is not a big secret nor is the fact about priests siring children. The big question is: Were they wearing condoms while doing it?

Hahayz. Nothing new.

[newbie.86]

It's been said that, during the Vietnam War, the Vatican didn't protest much against America's use of Napalm. They say that people who grew up in that era joked that if those B-52s were dropping condoms instead of Napalm, the Vatican would've heaped condemnations daily.

YES, BLAME THE VATICAN FOR EVERYTHING. Stupid is, and stupid does. Just another stupid excuse to shift culpability.

WHY NOT CONDEMN THE US for INVADING VIETNAM AND COMMITTING GENOCIDE AGAINST THE VIETNAMESE PEOPLE IN THE FIRST PLACE?

WHY BLAME A FAR AWAY ENTITY WHO HAS NO MILITARY CAPABILITY TO COUNTER THE AGGRESSION OF THE US AGAINST THE VIESTNAMESE??

Gays in the seminary is not a big secret nor is the fact about priests siring children.

Gays were everywhere, even in the military and even in your OWN household.

So no wonder if there are even gays in the seminary.

[<SMILE>]

It's been said that, during the Vietnam War, the Vatican didn't protest much against America's use of Napalm. They say that people who grew up in that era joked that if those B-52s were dropping condoms instead of Napalm, the Vatican would've heaped condemnations daily.

Gays in the seminary is not a big secret nor is the fact about priests siring children. The big question is: Were they wearing condoms while doing it?

Hahayz. Nothing new.

Nice joke though,
well, it helps replenishing the lives lost through the napalm.
Hmmm, even in the military gays do exist,
the man of all men department supposedly.

Gays in the seminary is not a big secret nor is the fact about priests siring children. The big question is: Were they wearing condoms while doing it?

Nope,
no condom or lewd fantasies as you've described,
for they are already excommunicated as per the church laws.
and I guess you better check the normalcy of your opinion
it is not so sound.

[newbie.86]

Mr Rufo presents himself as an advocate of Justice.

Then why not file the necessary cases against those culpable bishops and priests?

That would be a "great leap forward" towards accountability --
and not "chismis" where in the end, the culprits can dismiss his book as mere "gossip".


Can writing a book (and MAKING MONEY FROM IT) provide justice to the victims?
His motives are questionable in the first place.


MAKING MONEY OUT OF OTHER'S MISFORTUNE!!

[tonioyantao]

putting popcorn in the microwave setting it to high for 3 mins. Hashtag #priests # #gays # #condoms # #popcorn # am i doing it right?

[newbie.86]

^^^ enjoy the popcorn

[Bears Grill]

Some people are just lacking in comprehension. I'm not blaming the Vatican for Vietnam. The reason why I've prefaced my statements with "It's been said..." and "They say..." is because I've lifted them up from conversations that went on from James Carroll's Constantine's Sword, if you'd like to know. And even if I stated it as my opinion, I would only be criticizing Vatican's reactions to certain issues which reflects a lot on their priorities. I mean, come on. Why should one not point it out when the Vatican condemns trifle things like condoms and secularism, while remaining silent on more serious things like the Holocaust Final Solution or Napalm or even the genocide in Rwanda. Heck, they even ex-communicated a nun who assisted in an abortion to save the pregnant woman's life. Is one not allowed to criticize that?

It seems that the Vatican is blind to atrocities until they see condoms. The Vatican's knee jerk reaction to condoms is funny because it is. The joke is on the Vatican, not the Vietnamese nor the millions Africans dying of AIDS because of the dogma that says wearing condoms is immoral. If they're deaf to serious pleas, heck, why not try ridiculing their actions?

I am criticizing an institution's actions (or lack thereof) that deserves criticizing. That's all there is to it.

[balipseyev]

[<SMILE>]

Simply the church does not wish to become weak with it's stance,
for as per belief they are following the wishes of GOD,
they should be resolute becasue of the immense responsibility handed
over to them which is the salvation of the soul.

There should be no reactions for as always everyone are entitled
with invidual freedom to choose. The Church have the right as well
to counter any external derailments influences that would try to
sway it's subjects to follow what they wish and by no means akin to the church
rights for as mentioned they are the instigator of salvation.

Similarly, do we have to censure the policemen
just because they are enforcing the right law.
I guess not.