
Tagpila diay ang 18-250 bro?

build wise mas daghan ko na kit.an problems sa Sigma.. picture quality wise mao2x raman sila.. naka bantay pud ko sa Sigma mas warm ang mo gawas sa picture (better for portraits)... general rule sa third party lens.. read reivews, dako ang tabang... and test the actual unit!
good luck


I had a sigma 18-200mm f3.5:6.3 and tamron 28-75mm f2.8. I got good mileage out of these 2 lenses but had to tolerate their nuisance (all lenses have even Canon and Nikon, it's just a matter weighing the pros and cons). Once you get the hang of it and when you get to the sweet spot of these lenses, they can give you good IQ. What I noticed for both even for my Tammy is that they hunt in lowlight but this gave a chance to manually focus and use tripod and remote shutter release since I mainly shoot landscape and architecture with some street portraiture. The 3rd party brands mentioned have their respective niche and specialty. What I observed though is that sigma has more telephoto line up and built like a tank compared to tamron which is more plasticky.
if you ask me in terms of brand daghan kog reklamo sa sigma...
but i already compensated sa iya limitations... mine is 18-200mm it sucks at low light... slow AF but it works well sa well lighted nga scene... so far wala nakoy lain reklamo beside aning duha... for low light i snap on my nifty-fifty...
my sikma este sigma well be my lens until i get the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM or the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM, then the rest will be prime na...
Last edited by salbahis; 07-06-2012 at 10:51 AM.
i prefer tokina when it comes to third party lenses...

Salamat again guys ..this really helps
Similar Threads |
|