Well I did look before I posted, that is why I asked. She is a former President, Ellen Johnson was removed involuntarily by a vote of her board of directors. She has a Masters in Political Science and her University teaches social sciences, liberal arts, humanities, architecture, fine arts, design, music, drama, finance, psychology and public policy. No where does it show a background in Economics or does she seem to have ever held any post dealing in local economics or foreign economics.
Yes I should take the bias word of an Atheist activist with a personal agenda and no background in economics; over the non bias research of economist at the Federal reserve bank. After all what do Reserve bank economist know about world financing?
The problem is not my laziness, rather your deciding to once again to jack a thread to push your Atheist views, and willingness to be arrogant and condescending in you attempt to try to sound clever.
Yes why should I listen to anything she has to say on this subject? Why should I have to listen to anything any Atheist has to say about religion? Atheist are only seeking a path of non responsibility and consequences for their action, so you can believe you can do the things God does not allow. Gee if I act like he does not believe he will just go away, and I am free do do anything I want. You are welcome to believe that fallacy, just do not be offended if I avoid your folly.
Will God put me in hell for listening to Atheist? No. If I am silly enough to believe and leave my faith? YES, and that is a good reason not to listen to you jesters.




Your disbelief and conflict with this Reuters report is that it contradicts your own personal belief that religion is bad for societies, and religion's moral ethics do not effect a countries economy or allow for greater prosperity for religious societies. Follow the money