Make yourself clear dong, what is this subject your referring to,,& based on your explanation to regnauld your confusing the issue
comment kanang comment na walang explanation,,stop trying to be smart alick,,,i can see you through,,,well its so easy since i sniffed already your breed-that your a boxed catholic adorn w/
school textbook philosophical terms![]()
used plain english dong,,cause its not cool,,its so cheesy,, your attempt to sound very philosophical will not hide the weight of your understanding,
or Maybe your just confused w/ the word "subjective".
sige nga try to answer the question- w/c is appropriate to your mental pedigree-
I think therefore i am? or
I am therefore i think?![]()
"I think therfore I am" when individualites in the stage of evolution has been reached and Man is now a thinker . The I am has now posses the active Manas and differs from other Monads ( I am) who have net yet reached the evolution of Man. Beacuse Man is the really a Thinker or Manas from the root word man.
"I am therefore I think" what about those Monads who are still in the mineral kingdom, have they posses the Manas?
In fairness to Descartes, i would like to know if hes speaking metaphysically or just saying it..
The notion of the self?
can you make yourself clear dong, who decides for himself?
what is being irrational w/ rational psychology?
Descarte was right to some degree,,,as a materialist thinker.
Granting your right that the concept of the "I" is created by man himself, or as what you said imagined identities (w/c concept i dont have problems with)
so whats your problem w/ that?
whats your better understanding,,,objectively or subjectively speaking dong?
Similar Threads |
|