Evolution of Jesus? from man to God?

[Malic]

---

Malic, you reacted that a thread which compared Jesus to Buddha was a bit offensive to other religion, now what are you doing?

do you find this offensive? hahaha and the other thread is not?

Fyi hands...this is different, i am not comparing anyone here. Just trying to solve a puzzle.

[kebotDiNaMute]

do you find this offensive? hahaha and the other thread is not?

Fyi hands...this is different, i am not comparing anyone here. Just trying to solve a puzzle.

Waaa solve your own puzzle brad. I wonder malic everytime you ask me a question, no further comments naka? does it mean i answered your questions or you are just trying to tell everyone here that you know something? hmmmm...

[Malic]

Ahak ka simple ra ani brad oi...


"I am the way the TRUTH and the LIFE no one can come to the father except through me"

"For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, whosoever believe in him should not perish but have everlasting life."

--- brad if you are trying to deceive us by pointing out your so called history of age gap... whatever... Remember this these four person were the credible witness of christ they saw what He did, they saw miracles, wonders, and those are pointing to the father in heaven. Brad these witnessess wala ni silay surmabao brad kay lain lain ilang explanation that coincide with each other. If all the four witness says the same thing... then something is wrong.

--- malic we got four different authors and a thousands witnesses and a few hundred on his resurrection. What about kuran? when I read your kuran explanation about christ... it really does'nt mean anything you know why? everything are just kuran scholars insinuation. Well I can also insinuate why.... the point is your kuran had no witness.. maybe a witness of one which is the author... hahahaha. You call it witness? hagoy...

---- malic if our bible were proven wrong... then those will never be a subject of any debate in an out of its context... so Kuran? forget it... nobody even bother to read you know why dates are just screwed up. And one more thing malic. The only account of ADAM, EVE, NOAH, ABRAHAM, ISACC, JACOB are the old testament... sa ato pa ilang gi copya ang old testament? Dba na cya matawag nato off-shoot?

--- about the topic heres an analogy.
man1 - i saw the truck hit the structure.
man2 - i saw the man crossing the street and the truck loose control
man3 - i help the driver got out of the truck.
man4 - i am the man who cross the street.
man5 - i am the driver of the truck.

there you go. we have an accident we have the witness. again does the witness told the same way as the other? NO, actually malic this is the point of your Idea. At this point we are investigator. Now if you want to examine the accident, yes accident is there, so you want to examin the witness, well go ahead. Make sure you bring the real hebrew script para there will be no error in translation... ok. Try lang malic....

So you want a head on collision with Christians? hmmmm. I wonder why you cant stand... I'm afraid of booooom just don't go boom ok... mura mani desperation effort malic... hahaha

oh my goodness, your respond only shows how terrible your Bibliology is kebs.

let me point it out to you...

- the authors were witnesses? Study harder boy.

The names of the four gospels are not even the real names of the authors. some bible scholars would even went to say that these authors committed forgery by using the names of well known people siguro with the exemption of Luke.

Fyi kebs...there is a popular knowledge that the later gospels copied their data from the book of Mark and from certain Q documents.

- Four Gospels as witnesses for the Resurrection?

terrible reasoning and so misinformed. As ive said the Synoptic gospels copied the story from the book of Mark. By the way kebs, the four gospels had different accounts on Jesus' resurrection and they were not witnesses of Jesus' resurrection. They only heard it from boy abunda.

Study the qur'an kebs. study it...dont make me believe that you have read it and have studied it, me...ako na ng gitonan ang bible. thats where our difference lies.

- It is still the subject of debates because there are still people who insist that the bible is infallible and inspired. But they forgot that what they have right now are not even the original manuscripts.

- about the topic?

Wrong analogy kebs... very wrong...you know why? because again they were not eye-witnesses.
then Matthew, luke copied some story from Mark and the Q documents.

by the way kebs NT was not written in hebrew.

- a head collision with christians?

karon pa ka kabantay kebs? I can't stand? hahaha, why is it that mao jud ni ang rason nimo kebs, can we not aprroach this subject objectively? nothing personal kebs...nothing. Just a simple game of solving the equation. so don't go hysterical!

my goodness kebs, I have lots of christian friends and some of them are pastors.



and by the way this is not a desperate move but an attempt to solve this puzzling revelation.


So kebs...can you do it w/o going hysterical or not?

[handsoff241]

do you find this offensive? hahaha and the other thread is not?

Fyi hands...this is different, i am not comparing anyone here. Just trying to solve a puzzle.

I never mentioned it was not, and never did I say this is offensive. Why such thoughts Malic?

[Malic]

Mark 8:29-But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" Peter answered, "You are the Christ.

Matthew 16:15-16- 15"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?"16Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God."

so after 15 years instead nga you are the christ, ni evolve na into you are the Son of god.
--- patay ka screw up ra sa imo dates bantug ra, naa kay verse aning ilang mga AGE GAP. Bsin base ka ani lain libro ha...
--- brad, mo ingon gani ka after 15 years, does it mean mathew wrote the gospel 15 years before mark? is that what you are thinking? so you talk about evolution? wahehehehe, sorry brad. And because of this statement Bible is not TRUE? how nub .. hahhaha it takes more than that brad. ka alegre nmo oi. Not even your LOLO's ever found the bible wrong... so does it makes you better than them... aw...

--- brad bsan pila pay age gap nato brad... on this statement we know Christ ask Peter who he is... but because of different mind both got different way of saying things. Takes this analogy brad o.

you walk for 15 min to reach the place
you arrive 15min later.

the thought is you reach destination 15 min. Whatever your action is, its not important to the thought because whether you fly, you run or you crawl, its just mean the same thought, YOU REACH DESTINATION IN 15 Min. GETS? try using common sense to make it easier on you.

- actually kebs I want you to see the addition. Mark said you are the Christ, when Matthew wrote his gospel he used Mark as a reference, di ba kebs? wala mo tudloi ani. hahahaha. So the author of Matthew added " son of god " to the phrase " you are the Christ ". then it becomes, you are the christ, the son of god.

- hahaha nangayo ug verse si kebs sa AGE Gap, hahahahahaha. kebs, ask your bible scholars sila man ang ga date ana. haskang ka kebs... tuga tuga man intawn ka oi. Now all the more nga motoo ko nga you are just a nuisance, you are not really an apologist. your bible knowledge is so terrible. Im sorry I assumed too much.

- psst ayaw baliha kebs...Mark came first before Matthew. ayaw kalibog sa arrangement nga naa sa bible. hahahahaha. of course sa bible si Matthew ang gauna but in terms of date si Mark si older than Matthew. tsk tsk...wala man diay ni alam ang akong ka istorya oi. hahay kalisod.

siguro motoo pod ka nga ang Genesis maoy pinaka old sa Old testament noh? hahahaha

- wrong analogy again you got it upside down. sabta sa kebs ang history sa bible. ka paet abi nako you are the real thing as you project to be, dili man diay.

[Malic]

...and how about your mohammad? huh malic?

hangyo lang nako nimo ayaw na jud pag una2x pangita ug bikil kay sigurado jud maka sikma ka ug balot.

psssst remember im the terrorist.

[Malic]

I never mentioned it was not, and never did I say this is offensive. Why such thoughts Malic?

just asking questions and I wanted to clarify some stuff.

well then good, let me continue shall we?

[Malic]

Waaa solve your own puzzle brad. I wonder malic everytime you ask me a question, no further comments naka? does it mean i answered your questions or you are just trying to tell everyone here that you know something? hmmmm...

sorry kebs i dont like to comment, I want to debate.

[handsoff241]

just asking questions and I wanted to clarify some stuff.

well then good, let me continue shall we?

Continue what?

Is it a concern for you things about our God?

[kebotDiNaMute]

- actually kebs I want you to see the addition. Mark said you are the Christ, when Matthew wrote his gospel he used Mark as a reference, di ba kebs? wala mo tudloi ani. hahahaha. So the author of Matthew added " son of god " to the phrase " you are the Christ ". then it becomes, you are the christ, the son of god.

- hahaha nangayo ug verse si kebs sa AGE Gap, hahahahahaha. kebs, ask your bible scholars sila man ang ga date ana. haskang ka kebs... tuga tuga man intawn ka oi. Now all the more nga motoo ko nga you are just a nuisance, you are not really an apologist. your bible knowledge is so terrible. Im sorry I assumed too much.

- psst ayaw baliha kebs...Mark came first before Matthew. ayaw kalibog sa arrangement nga naa sa bible. hahahahaha. of course sa bible si Matthew ang gauna but in terms of date si Mark si older than Matthew. tsk tsk...wala man diay ni alam ang akong ka istorya oi. hahay kalisod.

siguro motoo pod ka nga ang Genesis maoy pinaka old sa Old testament noh? hahahaha

- wrong analogy again you got it upside down. sabta sa kebs ang history sa bible. ka paet abi nako you are the real thing as you project to be, dili man diay.

so you are questioning the witness? haha, wait ingon man ka scholars, lets chech ur evidence b.. naa ba? nuisance sorry, why are you addressing your questions to me? not just once or twice... common sense brad hain na? tagsa tagsa lang para d ka mag cge og jump from one topic to another...