religion made man OR man made religion

[j.alob]

---

mao gyud hehhe 2nd naman ni sa pangutana

who made God?

[leo_trams]

kung wala pa ang mga tawo wala may religion...
kung wala pa mga tawo, walay pud war...
so maayo pa patyon tanan tawo...wala nay lalis about religion...wala nay war.

let skynet rule the earth!

[joshua259]

man made man...

[edoy]

Religion made by a man.Religion makes you a man.

[kebot]

Who made man? GOD!

Who made GOD? man!

Good Logical claim. But science say GG. One time science said Quarks is God, now they said Its Strings. But man did not create them. Its science... 2o man ka science dba? libog nako nnu oi...hahaha

[cromagnon]

To think logically . What evidence do you have that gOd exist before man. Having no Evidence is Certainly an evidence Itself.

theres a lot of god. the only god i know is the Energy that created the universe.

on history the first few god r deer then cow, until its own image long since religion is made.


an athiest said if you can show me a single evidence that theres a god, then ill convert myself in split second, to ur religion.

[tarpolano]

in the olden times, ang tribu nga nindot og grupo o maayo pagka organisado mao jud ang maka survive. daghan baya tribu sauna, unya usa sa pamaagi nga ma-unite kay ang relihiyon. mao na nga ang ni-survive nga communidad kay kanang relihiyon nga dali maka padani og tawo nya violente sa uban kung dli mopatuo. parehas sa islam og sa kristiyanismo. mao na sya nga ang relihiyon gi gama sa tawo.

[SioDenz]

To think logically . What evidence do you have that gOd exist before man. Having no Evidence is Certainly an evidence Itself.

theres a lot of god. the only god i know is the Energy that created the universe.

on history the first few god r deer then cow, until its own image long since religion is made.


an athiest said if you can show me a single evidence that theres a god, then ill convert myself in split second, to ur religion.

To think Logically sad bro, ang Ozone na discover pag 1800's, ang Oxygen na discover nga naa diay na siya pag 1700's. Question: based on your logic, is it correct to say the in the year 1600 Ozone and Oxygen did NOT exist?

Kung di diay ka kita or wala diay evidence, Wala na diay ni exist an isa ka butang? mao ni imu pasabot?

[cromagnon]

to think logically in the neXt 1000 years maka discover na ang Tao nga Duna na Gyud diay GOD nga naa sa langit nanam piling.cya diay ang gamhanan nga nag himo sa earth. with real evidence - alien cguro na.

maayo ang ozone naa man ang evidence, with its atomic structure.

nag discover ang tao og god 3,000 B.C. it still exist till now with different figure . However there's still no known evidence.

as its said , i would only believe in your god. if it show on me , wake me up in the middle of the night. tell me everything he did. then surely i'd love to believe it/

[cromagnon]

so more likely its human drive to idolize or practice shaman thing. to express their Faith
which i also do practice but in a different way.