AMD X2 vs. Core 2 Duo

[ryantanchan]

---

c2d

[usrolla]

from my friend experience

c2d jud daw

[kwicksilver]

ako... just being loyal to the great , if "intel" may have surpassed amd in that level, it's just now, remember: karon pa sila ("intel") nka surpass after 2-3 years since gi release ang Athlon 64, misag way back sa mga bartons.

Sa pagka karon lng ni mga bros. nga taas sila. By the time ma surpass napud nila ang ungas..... AMD napud akong makita sa mga threads.

Anyways i still go for AMD, "the ferrari of processors."

[img width=500 height=333]http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DigitalMedia/43312C-01_CN1_0953.jpg[/img]

:mrgreen:

[butitoy]

ako... just being loyal to the great , if "intel" may have surpassed amd in that level, it's just now, remember: karon pa sila ("intel") nka surpass after 2-3 years since gi release ang Athlon 64, misag way back sa mga bartons.

Sa pagka karon lng ni mga bros. nga taas sila. By the time ma surpass napud nila ang ungas..... AMD napud akong makita sa mga threads.

Anyways i still go for AMD, "the ferrari of processors."

[img width=500 height=333]http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DigitalMedia/43312C-01_CN1_0953.jpg[/img]

:mrgreen:

im not inciting a flamewar but take a read about history bro...

anyways..it wud another couple or more of years ( hopefully ) b4 AMD with its bulldozer cores can reach ( and hopefully surpass ) the performance of todays C2D..but nevertheless..do not forget abot the NEHALEM core..

if that is still not enough..the 80core single die processor intel is currently developing ( there's an operational chip running win xp ) from ground up..and sad to say..if AMD will not catch in 2 years time..intel fans will be spending a lot just to buy a standard an entry level NEHALEM...

and ur amd is gud..but at the moment..INTEL is way much better...

as u may find it..the fastest phenom X4 is not even a match to a 2year old C2Q6600 in any marks.

and BE64000+ is not a match compared to a PD E2180 @4ghz in stockheatsink..

.....this reply is not fanboyism..its based on facts that u may find using www.google.com

[kingsoft29]

for me X2 kay pang games gud ba. then ang price mas lower kay sa c2d.

[cdi]

X2 is best at lower price.

[EarlZ]

99% of the E2160's cannot hit 4Ghz on stock aircooling unless you live in the cold waters of the northpole, but yes the E2160 can actually beat ALL the X2s available with a simple overclock.

C2D is better in terms of price/performance ratio (overclocking or just stock ) at any bracket, may it be the E2140 to the Q9450 as compared to what AMD has to offer now, Its upto you to believe those commercial review sites that shows AMD is still better.

[EarlZ]

ako... just being loyal to the great , if "intel" may have surpassed amd in that level, it's just now, remember: karon pa sila ("intel") nka surpass after 2-3 years since gi release ang Athlon 64, misag way back sa mga bartons.
:mrgreen:

Its always been like that, 1 company is in the lead for 2-3years then the competition takes over.. that cycles started even before the cyrix times.

But seeing to what AMD has to offer now and its roadmap in the future, purchasing AMD processors now is a HUGE waste of money.

[weezur]

Anyways i still go for AMD, "the ferrari of processors."

[img width=500 height=333]http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DigitalMedia/43312C-01_CN1_0953.jpg[/img]

:mrgreen:

no more AMD sponsorship for Ferrari.

[me82]

Amd fans gyd ko sauna pa pero can't denny that C2d has the crown gyd karon dats why m using c2d now..pero mahal lng cya gyd pero worth it for me
weeeeee C2D rules.. as of now ^_^ hehehehe