Do you agree with the dismissal of "*** inside Car" complaint?

[Master_Lampa]

quote author=talsik link=topic=103532.msg2063037#msg2063037 date=1160703685]


cgi...why the guard is not liable of unjust vexati0n like what you are suggesting.. because there was no element of physical harrassment or coercion although unjust vexation provision in the RPC is undefine and broad, we have enough jurisprudence to show how unjust vexation is committed. here are some of those Supreme Court decided cases...


[/quote]

CGE ka lang dah!! there was no element of physical harassment? ikaw may nagpakauwaw sa imu professor sa USC bai! mahal2x lang ka ug bayad diha!! cge ka lang ug ingun nga GRAY AREAS!!! ang LUBOT UG ILOK nimu maoy klarung gray areas!!!!

no need na ang physical harassment bai!! i saksak ni sa imung ilok ug lubot ug ipatik ni sa imung agtang nga jurisprudence ai!! yawat nalang magamit nimu puhon ining bar nimu... third year na baya tawn ka!!!

LILIAN GOZUM case, CA 54 O.G. 7409
- the crime of unjust vexation can exist for the reason that this term is broad enough to include any human conduct which although NOT PRODUCTIVE OF SOME PHYSICAL OR MATERIAL HARM, would unjust annoy or irratate a person or innocent person.

PEace nata!! dili na ko mo open ani nga thread!! bye bye!!

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

OT :

Hahahaha .... kanang tao GRAY ang kolor sa ilok ug lobot .... mao na ang angay iskortan sa sikyo .

[goryo13]

agree. wa mana sila naka bolabog og laing taw so ok ra. ang sikwate guard maoy maayo ipa priso kay gipaka uwawan sila

[INFRACTION]

mao man na ilang kalipay hala pagtagbaw... as long as wala cla naka disturbo sa publiko....

luoya sa sikyo sa... igo ra tawn cya namadlong... next time mga Agency set mog rules anang jerjer stuff case

[jancemsy]

para nako dli sila ka boot oi... ngiga gud nila

[dmcebu]

The car is a peraonal property is like a house, kong ang law enforcement officer mo search ug car kinahanglan ug search warrant unless mo volunteer ang owner nga ipa search ang car like sa check point, they have to ask kong pwede mo check sa car.

Its against the law mo search ug car kong walay specific reason nga crime is in progress inside the car like rape naay mag shaget ug resistance from other person. protects all individuals from unreasonable search and seizure. For a search to be "reasonable" it must be authorized by law, the law itself must be reasonable, and the manner in which the search was carried out must be reasonable (R. v. S.A.B., 2003 SCC 60). This means that the officer must be acting within the power of a valid statute, and it must be performed on the basis of there being "reasonable and probable grounds" that a crime has been committed.

[dmcebu]

protects all individuals from unreasonable search and seizure. For a search to be "reasonable" it must be authorized by law, the law itself must be reasonable, and the manner in which the search was carried out must be reasonable (R. v. S.A.B., 2003 SCC 60). This means that the officer must be acting within the power of a valid statute, and it must be performed on the basis of there being "reasonable and probable grounds" that a crime has been committed.

[Twinkz]

Hehehe para nako ok ra na oi kay wa man sila nagkatag sa public, wa say nireklamo nila nga nakahasol sila.Ilaha pod tong car.

Kong nakakita ang guard kay na curious ngano nag uyog,then naay ga seks, nipalayo nalang unta siya or iya gipasagdan. Wala may nishagit og HELPPPPPPPPPPPPP

[onig.heck]

IMHO... sakto lang ang gibuhat sa guard pag check what's happening inside the car... what if it's a murder diay... so na save ang victim... but unfortunately... lahi man diay iya na found out... "s#x"

[elvandesantos]

idismiss na oi... ahak dapat support ko sa dismissal kay utro pud bya ko hahaha. bahala magka bwesit na sakyanan nko!