you called the muslims "moklo" that is pejorative labeling. your are not politically correct. you are just plain stupid.
you called the muslims "moklo" that is pejorative labeling. your are not politically correct. you are just plain stupid.
tua ra! hahaha here we go again.. can't even continue to have a healthy discussion, give and take of opinion without calling names. Can't even give his well "educated" reply to point out his "valid" and "legal" based arguments..hahaha.. attitude sa usa ka moklo.
para nimo no oh! “Self righteousness belongs to narrow-minded.” ..![]()
![]()
- - - Updated - - -
now who is judgemental.. muslims mean all muslims? Hahaha tawn pod kalouy ni atty prof Juan... did I ever pointed out to all of muslims? Or is it only those rebel muslims?Hahahah funny kaau mo conclude man dayun si Judge.. atty juan hahaha!
Ok, I will not call moklo to all those rebel muslims as someone pointed to me "Moklo" is not for these guys.. hahaha, palpaka, suko pod ang usa wa kahibaw unsay meaning. Ang mga moklo kadto diayng mga member sa *ilaga group...
*They are the terrorist/rebels Filipino-Muslim or non-Muslims who were members of ILAGA Group (very known rebel groups in the 70's creating terror in the area of Visayas and Mindanao).
Last edited by yhokz101; 03-04-2015 at 02:31 PM.
whatever you say, you are just plain stupid. you cannot pull that one on me. you better read the narrative history of the muslim in the south. you read the history of the Filipino people. make your stupid brain work so that that stupid of yours will not be stupid forever.
Mr. Nincompoop, this forum would have been a great place for an intellectual discussion but it is infested with bigots and myopic people like you. I'd been to this forum somewhere and our discussions are educational where we can learn something. look at your posts here and read them again. they do not have the gravitas.
Yhokz, improve your argument so nobody will call you stupid again, hehe.. by the way its me who called you 13 yr old... Im back.
that s what is said before, only the supreme court can dcide if BBL is constitutional or not.. Sen. Santiago just gave her opinion but so many other law makers support BBL saying its constitutional. Since ARMM is written in the 1987 constitution and its nature is autonomous, BBL is more a revision of ARMM and being a substate is by nature a form of autonomy. When we say that ARMM is abolished, it s only the name but the entity remains and thats BBL.
Last edited by wireless; 03-04-2015 at 02:56 PM.
kinsa man lage nakig lalis kung kinsa ray maka decide sa BBL? Naa bay nakig supak ana nga ang supreme court? kinsa may ka atbang nmo ani? HAhaha.. naki sakay na pod ang kanahan ay...
I agree naay mi support sa BBL, it's cconstitutional lage way direct conflict sa iay provision(s).. then again why other people claim it unconstitutional? Can you prove it to them their reasoning and opinion dli valid? Unsa man imong opinion dong?
Similar Threads |
|