
Originally Posted by
bcasabee
Ohio.....
Thanks for the tip bro.....I just want to clarify that I have nothing against science, specifically the human evolution theory, even if it is just a theory and not a "fact" as some other guy in this thread had claimed that it is a fact. It will only become a fact when it is really proven again and again through observation and thus it will become a law, such as the natural law of gravity. The law of gravity is a fact, right?. But nevertheless, I support the idea of human evolution, vis a vis with the idea of Adam and Eve.
I even support the idea of humans to further evolve. I believe we will become lilfe forms of higher level. We can travel through space without any ship. We will be able to see nature so clearly with our new senses. Our reality will change, as currently, we are only limited to our 5 senses(just as the "lower forms of animals in the animal kingdom" are limited only to their primitive senses) thus blind to other things which we thought are non-existent.
Honestly, I don't care to side with which one view is correct, because the way I see it, there is really no legitimate conflict between the two. It won't hurt me in anyway if I accept both of those two ideas. Its just a matter of tweaking here and there so that it will be useful to my practical life. In other words, by being creative enough in making chaotic things or ideas in harmony, you can design your way of life intelligently so that you'll enjoy it. And for me, intelligent design is a fact and a natural law, because I have seen many people doing it over and over again in their practical human activity and were successful.
Sorry if I don't have the answer on whom to trust or to reject because I trust both. I am not the extremist type of guy. I am not going to ask you the same question cause I feel its just a useless exercise.