
Above is an illustration of the cost of premium between Term Insurance (Left side) and 5 Yrs limited pay whole life Insurance. Look at age 51 your Term Insurance is paying (Php134,410) more than Limited Pay Whole Life (Php228,200). At any age in Term Insurance there is no money if you withdraw, in 5 Year Limited Pay you can withdraw it or have a policy loan, example at age 51 you can withdraw at least (Php229,000) that figure doesn't include dividends and bonuses given by the company. Is that bad? Do you still want to invest on term insurance?
And if you said that you don't need insurance if your old? Think again if you die at age 80 what will you get from your term (which expires before age 80)? With whole life you get
(Php 1,000,000.00) that is
1 Million pesos added to your family. That is adding a
1 Million Pesos to your asset for just Php228,200.00.
If you still say you done need the additional 1 Million for your family when you grow old then withdraw it example at age 60 you can get (Php315,000.00 + Dividend and bonuses) that is getting back your premium already even at age 51 you still get your money back.
Can you still Term insurance is better than whole Life? Is Term Insurance better for your client or better for your commission?
For all those Insurance agent and Stock Brokers, this thread is about
Importance of Life Insurance not importance on how you can commission from your client, don't use thread for your personal gain. Is that how CocoLife deal with Insurances, if yes I will inform the Insurance Commision of the Philippines?
I had policy both Traditional and investment product in PhilAm, Sun, AXA and Prulife. All of them except Prulife are good.
Do Not be too selfish.
IT IS ALWAYS ABOUT YOUR CLIENT IT SHOULD NEVER BE ONLY ABOUT YOU.