AFP Modernization in Full Swing

[rockrhyan1982]

---

How about the su30 vs f22 raptor bro?

[alwaysdrunk]

kung maka comment ang mga waryors dre wagas! mura sag mga war analysts!way cgurog wa pamo ka kitag actual ana inyong gipang istorya...
taud taud sugod na dayog lalis abot na dayon page 1000 ang thread pa tas-anay ihi nyahahahaha peace!

[rockrhyan1982]

Ang AFP modernization naabot sa russia ug syria

[erwin_rommel]

How about the su30 vs f22 raptor bro?

even the f-15's powerful aesa radar is not enough to detect f22. how much more the su30

[erwin_rommel]

Ang AFP modernization naabot sa russia ug syria

nangambisyon man gud kag f-35 lol

[rockrhyan1982]

nangambisyon man gud kag f-35 lol

Ako nlng bawion.SU30 nlng ang paliton sa pinas.😆😆😆

[godwhacker]

So true,
Iraq,Afghanistan, and the rest were training grounds for US fighter pilots.

So true... maayo jud mangego ug target ang mga US pilots kay topnotch ang training... labi na ug third world country...

AFGHANISTAN
The U.S. Investigation Into The Kunduz Hospital Bombing Is Off To A Rough Start

YEMEN
US Planes Fired On Fleeing Civilians, Doctors Without Borders Says

SYRIA
Why Is The U.S. Silently Bombing Syria's Electricity Network?

[æRLO]

the usual "stealth" argument. welcome kaayo na nako ug matagak na like what happened to a stealth bomber downed in Serbia. and btw, full avionics, stealth and HMDs which are the bells and whistles has nothing to do with a plane that cannot turn, climb or run. its more of the design problem since its inception.

Bells and whistles that can preempt an oncoming fighter.

Unless the Flanker can manage to get close enough to engage it in a dogfight, it really is no contest. Even though maka duol ghapon the advantages of the Flanker is apparent but marginal. Nonetheless, F35s wont be used to the capacity of interceptors.

This is why I firmly believe the U.S. Aerospace programs are more versed with where modern air warfare is going. While China and Russia try to focus development on manuevarability, the U.S. is more focused on engaging in longer ranges and detection, out of reach and difficult to detect from the retarded Chinese and Russian planes doing barrel rolls and tight turns. Its like brining a sword to a gunfight.

[anggwaponi]

--- updating ---






Bomb-detecting robots to help cops secure Apec meet
NOTE: News link courtesy of Inquirer.net

[godwhacker]

Bells and whistles that can preempt an oncoming fighter.

Unless the Flanker can manage to get close enough to engage it in a dogfight, it really is no contest. Even though maka duol ghapon the advantages of the Flanker is apparent but marginal. Nonetheless, F35s wont be used to the capacity of interceptors.

This is why I firmly believe the U.S. Aerospace programs are more versed with where modern air warfare is going. While China and Russia try to focus development on manuevarability, the U.S. is more focused on engaging in longer ranges and detection, out of reach and difficult to detect from the retarded Chinese and Russian planes doing barrel rolls and tight turns. Its like brining a sword to a gunfight.

Why the F-35 is a sitting duck for the Flankers

"The biggest problem with the F-35 is that its US designers are betting on stealth and long range radar to compensate for its lack of speed and maneuverability. But stealth is not really all that it is cracked up to be; it is not the cloak of invisibility.

Plus, Russia’s already excellent radars are getting better. Says Defense Industry Daily (DID): “Meanwhile, key radar advances are already deployed in the most advanced Russian surface-to-air missile systems, and existing IRST (infra-red scan and track) systems deployed on advanced Russian and European fighters are extending enemy detection ranges against radar-stealthy aircraft. Fighter radar pick-up capability of up to (46km) by 2020 is proposed against even ultra-stealthy aircraft like the F-22, coupled with IRST ability to identify Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile firings and less infrared-stealthy aircraft at (92km) or more.”

At the same time, there is no such thing as one radar in a war. “There are lots of radars,” Sprey explains. “And you can’t be nose-on or dead-level to every radar in the theatre. There are always going to be radars that are going to be shining up (from below) or looking from above – they can all see you.”

haha...that just the flanker and the brand new PAK-FA will be commissioned for service on 2016.


EPIC FAIL: Here's Why Most US Weapons Systems are Worse than Russia's
Two reasons: complexity, and too much money