@giddyboy:
nganong sige man ka ug ingon ug na S sa mga tawo nga ni-question sa mga garcias?
wa mi ma-S anang mga Garcia because:
1] we are not Tomas' media mercenaries here, some people are just seeing the true agenda of the garcias between their spat.
2] i personally do not know both sides. so this is not personal for me unlike the CICC squealer.
3] let's stop quoting newspapers (that garcias own) or capitol websites or agencies/committees that gwen heads or highlighting awards (na mapalit) because even without evidences, a sound logic dictates that the projects were tainted with anomalies and irregularities and they did cut corners, ma-tommy or gwen. it's just hypocrisy on the side of gwen na mo-ingon na way utang ang province, highlight her accomplishments and that she did it all for the cebuano people because WE ALL KNOW THAT IS NOT TRUE and we do not need an evidence for that. basin pangayo-an na pud ko nimo ug evidence, hehe!! that is the beauty of the internet sir, just like congress. we can blab all we want with or without proof. so you see, walay difference ang Philippine Congress ug Istorya.net
4] tommy did more for cebu city than gwen did for cebu province. you want proof? gwen is more interested in province-owned lot in Cebu City rather than spending her time, effort and money to "further" develop the province. if i were gwen, i will bring the business to the province and i mean real business, dili ng flimsy, highly media-covered projects.
5] lastly, di kinawat among gi-kaon gikan sa nga "transactions" ug "commissions" mao na wa ko ma-S ana niya.
OT: nganong wa pa ma-release ang mga pension sa GSIS? unya nganong wa man lagi na gi-cover ug maayo sa sunstar? unsa man imong evidence-based explanation ana?