Your Least Favourite Moderator

[vern]

---

sobra pa's alright. except lang jud for those certain people na hopefully, di lang palabi, ba...

Something someone would say with the knowledge knowing they are in the right. With the knowledge that "nagpalabi" jud mi in their very own meaning of it.

there are certain times, actually. and saying that, i know you'd probably ask me to point out when and where but i'd rather not. i'm pretty confident i'm not the only one who thinks that way.

Certain times that we have intentionally try to hurt someone's feelings? Try to annoy someone? Try to insult someone? Just because you and others might think you are at the receiving end of insults or any offense doesn't mean it was intended. Your interpretation of our posts is your interpretation and hence your problem.

if you guys think that what you're being like is enough, and that you're sticking to the rules and you're morally correct, then how come members are complaining bout your actions?

The majority does not equal right. Haven't we been through this? A million men running down the street with their pants down yelling "look at me, I'm a banana" does not make it right. You say you know what it's like to be a mod, but you take out the human aspect of moderating. You take out the possibility that a mod might know something you don't. You take out the personal ethics of the mod. Being a mod is simple ... but don't reduce it to the lowest common denominator.

[iSTORYA]

we can or we cant please all people......but we can respect to people who deserved to be........sory to thos members who were under the strict moderation or even experience d consequences already or maybe this members doesnt read the forum rulez.......maybe u should also think u will not be given d ofence/punishment if u were not violating the rulez coz the modirators were just following the rulez and instructions from us and besides its there job to moderate and no bodysperfect.

"in case there is a modirator who wrongfully act hes/her power please feel free to PM to this people.....BeoR, Galadrel, iSTORYA, & Jumark......."

i think this thread must be lock. this may can cause a serious hidden bad feeling, misunderstanding, or even bad intentions direct or indirect from members to members, members to mods, mods to mods or even to us d admins.......this is something dat is direct insult to a moderator who strictly followed d rules in which case it can be solve only by admins if dat s really a big problem.......so be guided accordingly.......

as i said the instructions are simple.........

[irangejuice]

nah let them speak.
BeoR recently unlocked this topic.
Some good points were taken, some points were considered utterly imbecilic. But I kinda like how this thread turned out.. gives me an idea of what members think of moderation, moderators, the rules and other concerns they have.

[ryan]

seem peoples beef is just on one particular mod...now, i wonder why that is.

[Archie]

walay pinaka ganahan nga moderator?

[EarlZ]

walay pinaka ganahan nga moderator?

c n'gel ug c glassmoon ^_^

[EarlZ]

on the next updates moderators will have direct access to ban members through a "voting count system"--we just click to vote. we'll still be equal, that will always hold true. But to members: pretty soon it when updates will have been completed these rules will be very easy to shove down throats.

this can be a pretty BIASED system if ma ban ang member sa pag vote lang. ok ra nga voting pero what if the moderator(s) take it personally..nya sabotan.. go ko aning Voting system, but still the Admins have the final judgement kung dapat ba e ban ang ka2ng voted member.. as whats said here sa forums.. a moderator is no form higher than a member. they just have more duties.

[vern]

earlz: Moderators might share a certain dislike of a certain people, but we wouldn't go as far as to make sabot to clearly abuse a voting system that was meant to help us.

I personally like how this thread has turned out. Just because I argue my point doesn't mean I don't learn from what has been said.

[PissKhanXXX]

[EarlZ]:

you really think moderators are that stupid, don't you? i reckon you also think the admins would be so stupid to appoint moderators who are irresponsible. we are bound by rules when performing our duties. the same is true with members when posting!

we respect freedom of speech here but please don't abuse it.

[crinkle]

Something someone would say with the knowledge knowing they are in the right. With the knowledge that "nagpalabi" jud mi in their very own meaning of it.

well, if you think you needed to react to that statement then maybe you're affected by it.

Certain times that we have intentionally try to hurt someone's feelings? Try to annoy someone? Try to insult someone? Just because you and others might think you are at the receiving end of insults or any offense doesn't mean it was intended.

okay. let's say it wasn't intended. but knowing that you said something that could be a little too sarcastic or too arrogant to say and still post it anyway, gives us the hint that you deliberately wanted to make us feel like so.

Your interpretation of our posts is your interpretation and hence your problem.

then why is this becoming an issue for you if one's interpretation of each post is that person's problem? this is how we see things; your interpretation's your problem, right?

just like what Zerone_null said; some good points were taken, that's why we're posting on this thread. never mind the ones you guys think are too imbecilic.

You say you know what it's like to be a mod, but you take out the human aspect of moderating. You take out the possibility that a mod might know something you don't. You take out the personal ethics of the mod. Being a mod is simple ... but don't reduce it to the lowest common denominator.

how about the human aspect of being a non-mod? us knowing things you might not know of? if i was a mod here, i could always say "please stick to the topic " if needed, and not say anything more. that's not reducing you to any level, just saying what you want to say.

naa man gud uban na if mamadlong, naa pa ju'y pakapin nga side comments nga di naman jud ta kinahanglan. by doing so, an ordinary member might see that mod as bossy and obnoxious.

here's something else. what if kung mu post ang usa ka mod, saying something as a moderator, inyong e assign ug certain color ang text pero if personal opinion lang or comment, di lang. would that be helpful? could that be done?