The Church is responsible for over population in the Phils.

[shoeless_rebel]

---

u can't believe what other things the church is responsible for...

(i'm jot talkin bout cheap info u get from a bookstore paperback)

[goodsamaritan]

The Depopulation Agenda:

Dogma: Population Explosion? Over-population?
-------------------------------------------------
Imperialist lies of deceit for the enemy's people to contraceptivize themselves to oblivion.
Thus avoiding confrontational war. (See NSSM 200)
Cost still runs up to the Billions of Dollars in "Development Aid"
This is more effective than outright war that only kills millions and causes outrage.
This effectively eliminates hundreds of millions of people via contraception and abortion, and they will thank their imperialist masters for this.
This makes use of corrupt officials and useful idiots to implement suicidal policies.
Useful idiots are the mathematically inept people.
These are the lazy people who do not bother to check data if correct.
The internet is available for them to use, yet they dogmatically view only one side.
I mention dogmatic. In the most lucid sense since I am atheist.
I see dogmatic people... all the time!


45 Years of Population Control and Contraception Promotion, how much more contraception do you want?
In 2005: 3 children per woman Nationwide. 2 Children per woman in Metro Manila.
It is obvious that majority of Filipinos have contraceptive mentalities.
Only the dogmatic will deny this fact.

Anyone voting for 2 children per woman nationwide? Raise your hands.
Anyone voting for 1 child per woman in Metro Manila? Raise your hands.
(wait 10~15 years)

Anyone voting for 1 child per woman nationwide? Raise your hands.
Anyone voting for 0 children per woman in Metro Manila? Raise your hands.

I don't think I have other options to offer, we have run out of numbers.

I will tell you about the depopulation strategy in the next post.

[goodsamaritan]

The depopulation strategy:

- Fool the people with the population explosion hysteria by taking control of tri-media: newspaper, tv, radio (the internet is still relatively free, but not for long)
(effect: voluntary contraception for the "common good")

- Pervert the reproductive instincts of people by promoting promiscuity and pornography coupled with condoms and other forms of contraception - aka promote SAFE *** and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
(effect: reproductive un-health will result as the subject people's sexual energy is sapped and dissipated in useless, non-reproductive actions, promiscuous people have less children)

- Promote Feminism aka "equality" - force all women into the workforce, bash motherhood and feminine qualities, give micro-finance and micro-business education only to women, sow marital conflict, as if an office or corporation can have 2 bosses.
(effect: disfunctional families - less children, tired women - less children, more people in the work force - lower salaries due to oversupply of labor)

- Promote Contraception - as if it was the most wonderful invention in the world. Create a need for contraception. Promote a contraceptive culture. Begin all *** with contraception.
(effect: first *** is usually contraceptive, non-excited *** they want to make a baby, resulting in less children, many are overage by the time they "want" children)

- Promote STD mis-education, a culture of FEAR. AIDS is the number 1 population control tool for Africa. Watch out Philippines, the propaganda in the news about AIDS has started. AIDS is a misdiagnosis of other common diseases. Search google for "aids myth".
(effect: people will bow to SAFE *** or abstain until their genes die out, other misdiagnosed people are left to die of malnutrition, TB, malaria, etc.)

- *** Mis-Education - Promote all of the above.
Fact: Sexual Acts are Reproductive Acts. Attempts at reproducing. You are miseducated to think that *** is meant for pleasure. Nature does not design things that way. Unnatural means, unworkable, unsustainable, meaning, your genes will be contraceptivized to obliviion.

[goodsamaritan]

The reason the Bible and the Koran are blatantly pro-natal:

Contraception is not new. Many civilzations have been through the same tired cycle. Most of you are ignorant because nobody has taught you this:

Harmonious Monogamy and Some Polygamy -> Forced Monogamy -> 1 and only wives "need" CONTRACEPTION because the other wives have been relegated to mistresses and prostitutes who also "need" contraception -> Contraceptive Mentality for all - > Abortion Mentality -> Feminism -> Euthanasia Mentality -> Wholesale Destruction of Families -> Homosexuality Promotion -> Total perversion of all sexuality -> Soddom and Gomorrah like state -> destruction. Then back again.

Who will be left? The Pro-Natal, The Pro-Life, The non-contraceptives. History is written by the winners. That is why the Bible and the Koran are Pro-Natal.

[nopeace]

nah.. mao na.. most of you are ignorant daw.. hehe..

so.. who's deceiving who?
is this theory based on history?

and history, written by winners of what?

[bad donkey!]

i'm not an atheist but i do agree with goodsamaritan and he is right the winners always write history.It only focuses on 1 side of the story and the winner can say anything they wan't. let's face it we are just pawns and the other people are jsut other peices in a chess board...The one's making the moves are too big to be recognized and too far back in history to be named.

ignorant man gud mo! :mrgreen:

[tolstoi]

yah..same with u...and who's not btw?...

[goodsamaritan]

so.. who's deceiving who?

The depopulation / contraceptive imperialists are as usual deceiving the INDIOs (Filipinos). Not much has changed since Jose Rizal wrote his Noli me Tangere. Indios are still as gullible as ever after more than 100 years.

is this theory based on history?

You can pick any civilization that self destructs. Roman Civilization from 0-200 AD is a good example. Rampant contraceptive potions were available. The population decreased by 1/3. The Roman population AGED much. The rulers in the end panicked and passed all forms of legislation i.e. bachelor's tax to force people to procreate. The #1 contraceptive plant Silphium / Silphius became extinct around 200 AD. Most probably, crops were deliberately destroyed by the Roman people themselves.

How do we know about this now extinct contraceptive plant? Its image is cast in some Roman coins.

and history, written by winners of what?

History is written by the survivors.
The contraceptive people will be extinct. Again.
They will contraceptivize themselves to oblivion.
Most women today in their 20s to 30s will only have around 2 grand children.
The true Catholic Non-Contraceptive women will have around 25 grand children.
Descendants of Non-Contraceptives will be the winners of Life.

The USA wants to win via both birth promotion and immigration.
See George Bush aim to stop abortion and contraception.
See the USA promote abstinence instead of contraception as official US policy.
See the USA welcome millions of immigrants.
See the USA do the opposite of what they preach to other countries on population issues.
See the USA official strategy aim to increase population from 250M in 2000 to 500M in 2050.

Who is deceiving who?

[davanitz]

GUYS!!

Why we always BLAME somebody else since the PROBLEM is definitely on US that we lack discipline. Can't we not just think for a MOMENT if we can raise our child decently by adding more of those child?

[mannyamador]

Take note: the ADB and the UN (both of which are NOT prolife) have already warned about the dangers of population ageing. If not enough young people are born because of contraceptive and depopulation strategies, economies will stagnate and collapse. There is not a single large national economy in the whole world that is prepared for population ageing and depopulation.

In its Key Indicators 2002 report, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) warned of the dangers posed by the "graying" of society. Ironically, while the ADB has long espoused population control, in a news release on the report, it said:

"A looming problem in the future is population ageing, or when the number of people aged 65 and over is growing more rapidly than the working-age population. Population ageing is the phase after the demographic dividend. If the Philippines is unable to cash in on its demographic dividend, it could experience pressure on its social insurance schemes. While there is a family support system in the Philippines, population ageing will place enormous pressure on traditional means of intergenerational support."

One of the major findings of the study "World Population Ageing 1950-2050" by the UN Population Division stated that:

"Population ageing is profound, having major consequences and implications for all facets of human life. In the economic area, population ageing will have an impact on economic growth, savings, investment and consumption, labour markets, pensions, taxation and intergenerational transfers. In the social sphere, population ageing affects health and health care, family composition and living arrangements, housing and migration. In the political arena, population ageing can influence voting patterns and representation."

Overpopulation is not the problem. The real problems are greed, war, corruption. injustice, mismanagement, and -- soon -- population ageing and depopulation.

A recent paper released by members of the University of Asia and the Pacific School of Economics (whose members included Emilio T. Antonio, Ronilo Balbieran, Enrico Basilio, Jovi Dacanay, Roberto de Vera, Stephen Huang, Maia Tyche King, Winston Stan Padojinog, Cherrylyn Rodolfo, Kimberly San Agustin, Leandro Tan, Cid Terosa, Peter Lee U, and Bernardo M. Villegas) stated flatly that there is no real connection between poverty and "overpopulation":

"... we find that available statistics and scientific studies do not support the claim that "too many people" means "more poor people."

Bad governance and bad economic policies, not a large, fast-growing population, are the real causes of poverty. More specifically, we have found that:
[list] :arrow: Poverty remains unaffected or even decreases in a larger or increasing population. Population growth has little or no direct effect on per capita GDP growth. Thus, there is no basis for a policy that aims to reduce population growth to raise per capita GDP growth.[/list:u]
[list] :arrow: Poverty is usually caused by poor governance and inappropriate and badly implemented economic policies -- which leads to corruption, poor tax collections, lack of education and roads, lack of irrigation systems -- instead of a large and increasing population."[/list:u]

I think that should settle the matter. There is no basis for the "over-population" scare.