conspiracy theories

[xavisimao]

---

Tan-awa na lang gud ang video para kasabot mo.
Gahi-a sad nimog ulo oi.

"Conventional wisdom has it that Wall Street is the ultimate bastion of free-market capitalism and that the big bankers are, of course, diehard Republicans, red to the core. But the truth is far from that: Many of the leaders of the world's financial firms are as liberal as they come. As attorney and political strategist Jack Burkman explains, "People tend to associate Republicans with Wall Street, but the truth is, it's the Democrats that are in bed with the Street. And that's certainly true with Obama. He's been in bed [with them] from the beginning. And that was crucial to his victory. Without Wall Street's initial support he doesn't have credibility ... No doubt about it. Without Wall Street, Obama would not be in power today."

Maybe it's just to score points on the Manhattan cocktail circuit, but these six bankers break the mold and bleed Obama blue; what's more they all gave eye-popping amounts of green in the last election cycle to help elect a president they truly bought and paid for. Combined, these six alone gave $282,100 in the last cycle to the Democrats; their combined donations to Republicans: $7,650. That would be almost 37 times as much money going to the left as to the right. For more, see my just-released book, "Bought and Paid For: The Unholy Alliance Between Barack Obama and Wall Street.""

kinsa man intawn motuo sa imoha, nga imong mga rebuttal perti mang layo-a sa akong query, subaya kunog tarong akong mga pangutana...


di-a pay usa ka ebidensya ay sa lain thread...

Brad SD... Ilad2x na ang imong squeeze, hug, slide and etc... nga teknik para 9pm...

wa na intawn kay kredibilidad, hupas na...

[Soul Doctor]

kinsa man intawn motuo sa imoha, nga imong mga rebuttal perti mang layo-a sa akong query, subaya kunog tarong akong mga pangutana...


di-a pay usa ka ebidensya ay sa lain thread...


wa na intawn kay kredibilidad, hupas na...

Hahaha. hasta post dili kasabot unsa pa kaha ang theories.

ILADLAD na oi. DILI ILADILAD.
GABII PA GANI KO KADAUG P750.00

tungod ninyo dili nako mo post og numero didto.
Malisyoso mo pagkatao.
Katarung sa hangyo ni junax nga i-ladlad ang mga numero unya himoan nimog dautan nga meaning.
Pahuway bai. labhi nang utok ninyo kung naa pa man gani. Wala man gani moi point na contribute or na argue man lang diri, kung dili binabaye nga trash talk.

[Soul Doctor]

i think dili jud na siya mawala sa internet. some people, for the sake of fame and attention will make up stories blah blah. daghan na kaayo speculations and theories sa mga incidents and bisan dili credible, naa japon mo praise and worship nila.

which part ang dili credible sa 911?

i can always argue with you in any point anytime.

just state a point.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

It's different when you weigh things out Springy.
I came to conclude that it's fake. How about you?
If your presentation of proof na moon landing is way more truthful and convincing, why would not I doubt that it's faked?

susmaryaehusef

.

When you say that its different when you weigh things out then you are not presenting FACTS , you are presenting your VALUABLE OPINION that holds nothing but just plain personal convictions . Well, again ... nothing is wrong with that but if can clearly understand what I am trying to project here , unsay CREDIBILITY ninyo duha ni DOK and ikaw SKULLS na sakto mo ?

Dili niom ma draw ang line right ? And definitely you will indeed doubt it because you chose to be on the side of where you all see it as FAKED .

If you asked me ? Honestly , I dont see it as REAL nor FAKED in the thread because what I am seeing in here are CONSPIRACY THEORIES . Thats what title is suggesting right ?

[CocoCrunch]

naa man jud tawn room for error oi, kay gicontest man jud na sa uban kung tinuod ba o dili ang, o sakto i sayop ang pagkapresentar sa mga detalye sa panghitabo. sampol lang ang 911 ha. mga physicist naman gani ug engineer mismo maoy mi-ingon na demolition to. d pa ka motu-o ana?



insist na sakto mi for what we believe in? ahehehehe
mura wa man jud tingali kay nsabtan Brod.

pwede man na masayop mi, same ra man sad na sa dili daw conspiracy theorist na pagtuo.

possibl eikaw maka-change sa amo hunahuna, anybody can. basta katuhu-an lang jud ug credible daw ang nagpresent sa mga proof. just try.

try lang gud ug sabot sa pikas side sa istorya, palapdi gamay imong alimpatakan ba

ive only started visiting this thread like some days ago. i did not and wouldn't back read all the hundred pages and i did not and would not open all the links and read all the things you say and mention. the reason why im confused is both sides nagclaim credible author, physicist, engineers etc... for your 911 na issue, mo claim ka na mismo mga physicist and engineers na nagsulti BUT naa pud sa pikas na side na credible sources pud.

i wouldn't dare to present any other links to oppose anyone's theories or links para lang machange inyong huna2x coz it seems both sides mo insists raman japon. dili jud magdaog.

maypag isticky ni nya iindex ang mga links ninyo sa 1st page.lol

[CocoCrunch]

which part ang dili credible sa 911?

i can always argue with you in any point anytime.

just state a point.

do you always argue? i will just roll eyes and give in. bitaw, id rather google it myself and might read some pages and links you've posted here..

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

^^^

Thats what DOk should have done since he loves CONSPIRACY THEORY .

Use GOOGLE since thats where he got all the ideas he had about CONSPIRACY THEORY .

But what he wanted is a DISCUSSION that ended up with COPY and PASTING articles from GOOGLE . The funny thing is , he was also presented with a COPY and PASTED article from GOOGLE , only to hear from him that he is right and we are wrong . Isnt it ironic? That he knew the credibility of these authors and people who uploaded videos .

Rawr !

[pinoy_09]

That's what SD is good at. He copies and paste articles and get most of his "discussion kuno" from Google, and makes it look like it came from his own INTELLECT.

[Soul Doctor]

That's what SD is good at. He copies and paste articles and get most of his "discussion kuno" from Google, and makes it look like it came from his own INTELLECT.

It just goes to say nga wla moy dag-anan nako kung argument lang istoryahan.
Kutob ra mo palusot.
Pahuway mo oi.
Daghan pa mas maayo ninyo.

General discussion gani ni nga channel.
We are here to discuss.

Kamo pacomment comment ra mo kutob.
Unsa ni, Friendster o facebook?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

@ SOUL DOKTOR ...

Since when na naay ARGUMENT that occured that relied on your wits and knowledge ? I even find it more funny when you talk about your accomplishments , pagka chemical engineer nimo when in fact all your arguments came from GOOGLE ?

Now tell if I am missing something ... wala mi dag-anan sa ARGUMENT nom yet we are here to DISCUSS . Did I mention it to you already what DISCUSSION means ? Now thats the mother of irony na kay you came up with all these SCIENTIFIC TERMS and yet you dont even know the appropriateness of where or how to use the word DICUSSION and make it into a DISCUSSION .

Lately ... pa comment comment na lang but it doesnt justify na FACEBOOK or FRIENDSTER ni , it just clearly projects unsya nature na sa discussion nimo .... GOOFY !