mao ni giingon, kugihan ning pinoy hehehe
OT na ni...
mao ni giingon, kugihan ning pinoy hehehe
OT na ni...
dli ta mo Off-topic beh,
Someone answer my question: nganong mas mahal mang ang Intel kaysa AMD?
I mean tan.awa ha,
Intel Core i3 530 2.9ghz------5.6k
Intel Core i3 540 3.0ghz------6.5k
Intel Core i3 650 3.2ghz------9k
AMD Athlon II X3 435 2.9ghz (unlockable)-----3.9k
AMD Athlon II X3 440 3.0ghz (unlockable, not sure)-----4k
AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz-----5k
sooo unsai difference? mo puno ko og 1k+ pra mas bugnaw nga processor?
u're getting it wrong..read more i suppose..
here's one f many reviews. : Athlon II X4 640 vs. Core i3 530 CPU Review | Hardware Secrets
"Conclusions
The Core i3-530 and the Athlon II 640 proved to have around the same overall performance level, making the decision of which CPU to buy purely a decision of which brand you like the most, if you are an average user.
However, there were some specific scenarios that deserve reconsideration of the above statement. If you run professional applications that can recognize and use more than two CPU cores, the Athlon II X4 640 is a better option. Even though the Core i3-530 can simulate two extra cores thru the use of the Hyper-Threading technology, CPU-intensive programs will run faster on CPUs with “real” cores: the Athlon II X4 640 crushed the Core i3-530 in 3D rendering (36% faster on Cinebench) and provided a pretty decent advantage on DivX conversion (14% faster on VirtualDub using DivX codec).
On the other hand, the integrated video present in the Core i3-530 processor was much faster than the integrated video provided by the AMD 890GX chipset, 41% on Call of Duty 4. But don’t get excited: with only 19 frames per second with all image quality settings configured at their lowest values, it will be very unlikely that you will play games with the integrated video available in this processor (or, let’s be honest, with any kind of integrated video). But on FarCry 2, both integrated video solutions achieved the same performance level.
Playing these games using a real video card (we used a Radeon HD 5670) gave a tiny advantage to the Core i3-530, but with only a four-percent performance difference between the two benchmarked CPUs, we are more inclined to say that both achieved the same performance level.
"
accounting law of supply and demand
and law of the jungle. He who reigns dictates..
and here.. this is i assemble for my opismate
Intel Core i5 750 - 2.66GHz - 1MB L2 - 8MB L3 @ Php 9,595.00
vs
AMD AMD Phenom II X6 1055T - 2.8GHz - 3MB L2 - 6MB L3 @ PhP9,395.00
Bench - CPU - AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News
u will read ^^^ the intel had the edge..and thats just the raw stock speed of the i5 750 at 2.66GHz
and just envision.. at OC speed of 3.3Ghz of my friend i5 750 with just the low profile orig HSF..
definitely the x6 is nowhere near it
Sorry It's i5 pala. hehe
ang "heat issue" akong g gamit since mao man ang PINAKA discussed topic ani nga thread.
MORE!
It's Now:
Athlon II Vs. iCore
AMD ako preferred na Procs
pull the rope if you can.
![]()
go for AMD..............
Similar Threads |
|