
Originally Posted by
doi
@bongoton
bai wa man ko ng damgo ma pildi c manny.... ako gusto lng ko mo pili on what i think and di man ko manny hater... or maybe hater raka nako hagbay ra jud ka mo palag nako dah but imo sad nah... i have my own opinion and u too....
and calling mayweather a fraud?! wadapek! roach should know better...
hehehe.. nagtuo ka nga hater ko nimo kay mo palag ko? di tawn no.. i don't waste my time hating people.. ang ako lang man gud na obserbahan nimo sa una pa is you're always rooting for Manny's opponent. I'm not saying you're a hater.. All I said is padayun lang sa imong damgo nga mapildi si Manny co'z that's what your comments in the past threads manifest. You wanted Manny to lose.
Obviously, you're favorite fighter is Mayweather as you have amassed all possible reasons why he's playing it safe all these years (since 2002). I don't take it against you, but I just don't buy it.
Great fighters are defined not only how good they are, but who and how they fought. Mayweather has great boxing skills, no question about that, but is he a great fighter? I think not. His fights lack action and drama despite the opposition lacking the threat to actually beat him. Pacquiao on the other hand is the total opposite. He always walks in the danger zone to prove that he can hang with the best in the sport. Pacquiao fought opponents who were actually favored to beat him. Floyd never fought opponents who might give him trouble since his second fight with Jose Luis Castillo.
Mayweather always takes the very safe route, citing "business" reasons to keep his "0", which isn't really a big deal. Floyd could have been the best, really, only if he took the boxing road like Pacquiao did.