proof dyud unta ba, dili lang kay sulti sulti lang...tsk tsk tsk..para dili dyud malalis
proof dyud unta ba, dili lang kay sulti sulti lang...tsk tsk tsk..para dili dyud malalis
then again sir, at any reason we come up. the burden of proof is still on you sir.. for i myself can't explain where we came from, but proving us wong is not a stand that you are right.
False Dichotomy
Arbitrarily reducing a set of many possibilities to only two. For example, evolution is not possible, therefore we must have been created (assumes these are the only two possibilities). This fallacy can also be used to oversimplify a continuum of variation to two black and white choices. For example, science and pseudoscience are not two discrete entities, but rather the methods and claims of all those who attempt to explain reality fall along a continuum from one extreme to the other.
^^ Mao na kasagarang style sa mga atheists, bay. Lipat2x. Kun maipit na, mao ni ilang typical response:
A. Ambot
B. We don't have to prove anything.
C. Read your science book
D. All of the above.
![]()
@lingkwyz Ayaw na sige palusot, bay. Maypa tabangan nimo pangita si @vipvip68 sa scientific journal diin na-publish ang scientific experiment nga nakamugna og usa ka living organism gamit ang kuryente ug mga inorganic compunds.Para mobalik ang credibility sa mga atheists. Para libre na pud mo maggamit2x anang 'pink unicorn' analogy ug kanang term nga 'burden of proof'.
![]()
Last edited by yanong_banikanhon; 07-03-2011 at 12:44 AM.
Unfair ba? Let me cite some examples.
Naay mo ingon nga ang iyang papa na stroke and heart attack, naparalyze, bedridden, nabaon sila sa utang then namatay... Blame dayon ni God nga ngano gepa antos sila ug maayo nga mosimba man unta sila... Pero looking back sa root cause, ngano diay nasakit iyang papa kay tungod sa unhealthy lifestyle. Inom, smoke, kaon ug unhealthy foods, bisan ni advise na ang doctor to refrain it's consumption.
So, si God diay ang nag encourage sa iyang papa mag inom, manigarilyo and etc..?
Second example... Naay uban couples, dugay or dili magka anak. Ge blame dayon si God nga unfair. Pero looking at the root cause again... One of them, or maybe both.. during their young and single lives, nag engage sila ug premarital ***, or worse, multiple sexual partners... then na STD...
So mao diay to ang cause sa ilang infertility/sterility... ang STD due to previous sexual encounters.
And other instances which are too many to mention.
But... maayo nalang, God is passionate and kind. Inspite of the misfortunes, He never forgets us in those times and even afterwards. He still gives us a new chance in life.
Dili man lagi mabalik ang deceased father, but makadawat pod ug other blessings, not only spiritual but sometimes physical and material gifts.
Bisan na infertile, pero ang uban maka anak ra gehapon in a normal way. Ang uban thru artificial... pero financially blessed man sila mao na maka afford ug medical intervention. Ang uban sterile, pero maka ampon pa ug wonderful child.
Last edited by Sanosuke; 07-03-2011 at 12:51 AM.
From the same article you've mentioned:
The new organism is based on an existing bacterium that causes mastitis in goats, but at its core is an entirely synthetic genome that was constructed from chemicals in the laboratory.
Tsk.tsk.tsk. Nisamot akong pagduda, bay da.Ingon ka, inorganic chemicals lang ang gamit, unya bacterium man lagi? Inorganic chemical diay nang bacteria, bay vipvip68?
Pagtarong, bay ha. Makasab-an baya ka ana sa imong biology titser sa hayskul.![]()
Last edited by yanong_banikanhon; 07-03-2011 at 12:50 AM.
Similar Threads |
|