
Originally Posted by
yhokz101
Did you catch what I said on "they are studying and reviewing it if it is indeed will threatened the Philippine's sovereignty, right?
Did that even conclusive to you and if it is then you are assuming all what I mentioned conclusive to say BBL is indeed unconstitutional? Wla nalang unta na nila gi review o approve na unta na diretso if kanang mga cogressman o sa senate wala naka sense og mga irregularities sa provision sa bbl in regards sa constitutions?
Hahahah i was merely quoting her statement and posting my previous post of possible breach against sa constitution. This is simple you mocking me on how I put all those statement, and on how I catch your attention must have put a nail into your BBL. The main reason I will always say is why the heck would they want to separate and establish their own entity? And to think this agreement is between the executive branch and the MILF. We do have 3 branches, and that the reality is that only one of the three branches of government - the executive branch, consisting of the Office of the President acting through a peace panel of negotiators - represented the government. The executive branch alone does not represent the Philippine Government, db? Thus, the executive branch, in negotiating the Agreement had no power to bind the two other branches - legislative and judicial. In negotiating for the government, I am afraid that the executive branch not only exceeded its powers, but may have infringed upon the powers of the legislative branch.
This Agreement is between the Philippine Government (GPH) and the MILF. It is misleading for the Agreement to identify that one party is the "Philippine Government." The reality is that only one of the three branches of government - the executive branch, consisting of the Office of the President acting through a peace panel of negotiators - represented the government. The executive branch alone does not represent the Philippine Government. Thus, the executive branch, in negotiating the Agreement had no power to bind the two other branches - legislative and judicial. In negotiating for the government, I am afraid that the executive branch not only exceeded its powers, but may have infringed upon the powers of the legislative branch.
No direct provision in our current Constitution as I've heard/read but the interpretation of it as described as it would be contrary to the Constitution because it provides that the National Government retains all the powers not devolved to the local governments.
The Exclusive Powers given to the Bangsamoro also provokes controversy. Ako e site sa akong nabasa lang ni ha..
In the Constitution it has vested the legislative powers in the Congress of the Philippines and has given Congress the responsibility of giving life to certain provisions of the Constitution. Among them is Article XIV of the Constitution on Education, etc. which provides, inter alia, the following:
“Section 3: (1) All educational institutions shall include the study of the Constitution as part of the Curricula;
(2) They shall inculcate patriotism and nationalism, foster love of humanity, respect for human rights, appreciation of the role of national heroes in the historical development of the country, teach the rights and duties of citizenship …”
Enacting the laws to activate these provisions of the Constitution on education should go a long way to achieving national reconciliation and unity...BUT
On the other hand, it may be noted that the Bangsamoro Basic Law(Article IX on the Right to Education) is silent on the ideals of nationalism and expresses only the needs, ideals and aspirations of the Bangsamoro as may be seen below:
Article IX of Section 13. Integrated System of Quality Education: The Bangsamoro Government shall establish, maintain, and support, as a top priority, a complete and integrated system of quality education and adopt an educational framework that is relevant, and responsive to the needs, ideals, and aspirations of the Bangsamoro.
They are lacking of expounded interpretations will mean everything.. just as you will know, words means a lot. And if that is open to interpretation, it clearly violates and does not upholds on what is stated in the constitution.