The Roman Catholic Church~ Questions

[NASYO]

---

Marukoy jud diay to c ELI buendia no, AW, soriano diay..

Bright jud.. DAGHAN gud KAAYO ang NATUNTO, NAGPPATUNTO ug UTO-UTOHON..

[rcruman]

Try to read my post in INTERESTING CONVERSATION THREAD. I posted there a criminal case [about bouncing check] of Eliseo Soriano

you're getting information wrongly and uncooked bro.
That bouncing check has been dismissed by the court (supreme court).
It was our Former member the owner of pampanggas best that made that.
She's our former member and demanding some doctrine that she will be excluded and she will just give money (big contribution) for her exemption.
Then Bro Eli give her a blank cheque because bro.Eli borrow money (with Lolita hizon insisting to lend for the evangelization) and will just inform LOLITA if bro. ELi deposited payment to that cheque. But when the time LOLITA HIZON can't stand the doctrine and she was excommunicated she deposited all blank cheque (i think its 7 pcs.) all in the same time and what do you think will happen if you will deposit all blank cheque in the same time without any amount?

bro FORESTER just go to the SCRA (supreme court report annotated) and you will know the truth.

Marukoy jud diay to c ELI buendia no, AW, soriano diay..

Bright jud.. DAGHAN gud KAAYO ang NATUNTO, NAGPPATUNTO ug UTO-UTOHON..

ayaw patakag layat bro kay wala kakahibalo nga huyong-huyong diay imo gilayatan.
Pataka dayon kag hamag og issue nga wala nimo suwetuha kung tinuod or asa gikan.

Peace!

[bcasabee]

I'm just curios with this ADD practice. What doctrines in which someone can be exempted by giving big contribution and how much should one give for one to get exempted?

She's our former member and demanding some doctrine that she will be excluded and she will just give money (big contribution) for her exemption.

[aztina888]

hahay mga tao (you know who you are) mag sige ug ingon na the only book you will get the answer from is the bible pero mu gamit ra sad d.i ug lain source.

[rcruman]

ic.. mao diay daghan ni ug kaso diri sa pinas si Eliboy ni sibat pajud!

nawa ra imo intensyon, bro tan-awa sa kung unsa nga kaso, fabricated ba or dili.
og tan-awa kung asa gikan ang mga kaso og kinsa ang nagpaloyo.
Ang nakapait man gud nimo kay basta naay kaso ang usa ka tao dautan na, kahibalo ka bro sayon ra pagsang-at og usa ka kaso sa usa ka tao nya kung kaila ang piscal kay dali kaayo maka issue og warrant of arrest even the evidence is weak and not valid.

So dautan pud diay si Pablo og si Jesus kay naa man silay mga kaso?

PEace!

[rcruman]

I'm just curios with this ADD practice. What doctrines in which someone can be exempted by giving big contribution and how much should one give for one to get exempted?

i think you have a problem in reading bro.
balika og basa ang ako post. its not our practice but its her who demand to give big contribution just to be exempted in some doctrine like (modest apparell and jewelries). Pero wala musugot si bro.Eli kay ang doctrina kay doctrina gyud. So natiwalag siya og wala na nagpadayon.

Read again my post bro aron maklaro ang imo question:

She's our former member and demanding some doctrine that she will be excluded and she will just give money (big contribution) for her exemption.
Then Bro Eli give her a blank cheque because bro.Eli borrow money (with Lolita hizon insisting to lend for the evangelization) and will just inform LOLITA if bro. ELi deposited payment to that cheque. But when the time LOLITA HIZON can't stand the doctrine and she was excommunicated she deposited all blank cheque (i think its 7 pcs.) all in the same time and what do you think will happen if you will deposit all blank cheque in the same time without any amount?

in this post of mine its clearly shows that its LOLITA HIZON who demanded to be exempted and promised to give big amount of money/contribution.

Bro sa amoa bro bisan pa datu or pobre ka kay equal ang tanan.

Peace!

[KABAW]

atik

[aztina888]

atik

ahahaha alien alien.!!!
bitaw oie dapat jud susihun jud usa ang kaso before ka mag pasangil noh? dli dayon dayon ug salpak dri.. TOINKZ

kay naa naman na nga kaso so gi share ra na. defensive ra au ka brad dah. relax dli lagi na ma unsa imu Bible IDOL ELIBOY. kung walay sala di walay sala dli angay mag defensive mode. hehehehe

[necrotic freak]

nawa ra imo intensyon, bro tan-awa sa kung unsa nga kaso, fabricated ba or dili.
og tan-awa kung asa gikan ang mga kaso og kinsa ang nagpaloyo.
Ang nakapait man gud nimo kay basta naay kaso ang usa ka tao dautan na, kahibalo ka bro sayon ra pagsang-at og usa ka kaso sa usa ka tao nya kung kaila ang piscal kay dali kaayo maka issue og warrant of arrest even the evidence is weak and not valid.

So dautan pud diay si Pablo og si Jesus kay naa man silay mga kaso?

PEace!

ug ang evidence is weak and not valid nganong ni sibat lagi? ug fabricated dapat atobangon ang kaso! aron ma clear ang name. sibat man nuon! hehe

ang nature kaso nilang Pablo ug Jesus parihas diay sa imong amo? nang rape diay to silang Pablo ug Jesus?

[oTnur]

The Primacy of Peter is an important teaching of the Bible. Anti- Catholics have to disobey the Pope's authority just to create thier own appetite by confusing the ignorant sheep of the Catholic Church.. It is interesting to know how they misinterpret those biblical parts to escape from the obedience to the Pope.

Jesus was able to see the anarchy and divisions that Satan can create in the only one Church He instituted. It was the Great desire of Our Lord Jesus Christ that His followers must be united together. (Jn 17:11) " Holy Father, Watch over them...... that they may be one just as we are" He decided to make Peter the leader, so that all shall be united under him. (Matt16:18-19) " And I tell you , you are Peter and upon this Rock, I will build my Church and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it.

The infallibility of the Pope is more contrivercial and most criticized because anti-catholics create an artificial confusion by mixing the infallibility of the office of Peter and his legitimate successors, with their personal human defects. Infallibility does not mean that the Pope will not make personal mistakes, but refers to the trust of the Church in the promise of Lord Jesus to decide on matters pertaining to Faith and Morals.

" After the Martyrdom of St. Paul , St. Peter,and St. Linus was the first to obtain the episcopate of the Church at Rome."

The unbroken chain of Successors continues and reaches to Pope Benedict XVI the 265th successor of St. Peter. THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE OF THIS SUCCESSION IS MORE RELLIABLE THAN THE 2000-YEARS HISTORY OF ANY OTHER COUNTRY OR KINGDOM IN THE WORLD TODAY.

And thats How it is.


Peace!