Page 106 of 157 FirstFirst ... 96103104105106107108109116 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,060 of 1563
  1. #1051

    Default Re: conspiracy theories


    Quote Originally Posted by rodsky View Post
    It's NOT funny when established science becomes the object of jest and mockery.

    -RODION
    depends on how you look at it

  2. #1052
    C.I.A. rodsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    7,445
    Blog Entries
    128

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by BeerBreeze View Post
    depends on how you look at it
    I don't have to look at it--I've been immersed in it. I have been a college instructor and for a while, the head of a university-based amateur astronomy club, and I have seen the detrimental effects that jokes and mockery have on how kids and young people nowadays perceive science. It's a sad story, and what's even sadder is, kamo man ang biktima--wala lang mo kabalo.

    -RODION

  3. #1053

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Soul Doctor View Post
    Ikaw gaingon ana.
    Nangita ra kag bikil toy.
    Akong giingon gaexpect ko nga maghimo kag clone account,
    maybe pinoy_09 is a clone account.
    Karon ra gud ka nitunga.
    Taka-taka na pud.

    I admit, I have an old account and I've never denied that. I forgot my old password so I created this new account. But to make it sound like I'm posting from clone accounts is so far-fetched. All you need to do is PM admin/mod to check on me, if you're really that desperate.

  4. #1054

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Conspiracy theory defined...

    Conspiracy Theory:

    Anything that is against the established Elite Government either true or untrue is A Conspiracy Theory. It is not science vs fiction. It is the between the Elite Propaganda of Scientific Tyranny VS People who loves Freedom and Justice.

  5. #1055
    C.I.A. rodsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    7,445
    Blog Entries
    128

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by biano View Post
    It is not science vs fiction
    "Human beings will surely die if they cross the Van Allen Radiation belts." is not science vs. fiction? *shakes head*

    -RODION

  6. #1056
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    5,363
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Here's the link:
    The Apollo Hoax
    Interesting read. try to answer 33 questions that needs to be answered

    1) Sceptics argue that the lack of stars on Moon photographs is acceptable, despite zero atmosphere to obscure the view. Yuri Gagarin, pronounced the stars to be "astonishingly brilliant". See the official NASA pictures above that I have reproduced that show 'stars' in the sky, as viewed from the lunar surface. And why exactly do you think there are hardly any stars visible on Apollo films taken from the Moon? The answers simple - Professional astronomers would quickly calculate that the configuration and distances of star formations were incorrect and so NASA had to remove them to make sure they could keep up the scam.

    2) The pure oxygen atmosphere in the module would have melted the Hasselblad's camera covering and produced poisonous gases. Why weren't the astronauts affected?

    3) There should have been a substantial crater blasted out under the LM's 10,000 pound thrust rocket. Sceptics would have you believe that the engines only had the power to blow the dust from underneath the LM as it landed. If this is true, how did Armstrong create that famous boot print if all the dust had been blown away?

    4) Sceptics claim that you cannot produce a flame in a vacuum because of the lack of oxygen. So how come I have footage on this page showing a flame coming from the exhaust of an Apollo lander? (Obviously the sceptics are wrong or the footage shows the lander working in an atmosphere)

    5) Footprints are the result of weight displacing air or moisture from between particles of dirt, dust, or sand. The astronauts left distinct footprints all over the place.

    6) The Apollo 11 TV pictures were lousy, yet the broadcast quality magically became fine on the five subsequent missions.

    7) Why in most Apollo photos, is there a clear line of definition between the rough foreground and the smooth background?

    Why did so many NASA Moonscape photos have non parallel shadows? sceptics will tell you because there is two sources of light on the Moon - the Sun and the Earth... That maybe the case, but the shadows would still fall in the same direction, not two or three different angles and Earth shine would have no effect during the bright lunar day (the time at which the Apollo was on the Moon).

    9) Why did one of the stage prop rocks have a capital "C" on it and a 'C' on the ground in front of it?

    10) How did the fibreglass whip antenna on the Gemini 6A capsule survive the tremendous heat of atmospheric re-entry?

    11) In Ron Howard's 1995 science fiction movie, Apollo 13, the astronauts lose electrical power and begin worrying about freezing to death. In reality, of course, the relentless bombardment of the Sun's rays would rapidly have overheated the vehicle to lethal temperatures with no atmosphere into which to dump the heat build up.

    12) Who would dare risk using the LM on the Moon when a simulated Moon landing was never tested?

    13) Instead of being able to jump at least ten feet high in "one sixth" gravity, the highest jump was about nineteen inches.

    14) Even though slow motion photography was able to give a fairly convincing appearance of very low gravity, it could not disguise the fact that the astronauts travelled no further between steps than they would have on Earth.

    15) If the Rover buggy had actually been moving in one-sixth gravity, then it would have required a twenty foot width in order not to have flipped over on nearly every turn. The Rover had the same width as ordinary small cars.

    16) An astrophysicist who has worked for NASA writes that it takes two meters of shielding to protect against medium solar flares and that heavy ones give out tens of thousands of rem in a few hours. Russian scientists calculated in 1959 that astronauts needed a shield of 4 feet of lead to protect them on the Moons surface. Why didn't the astronauts on Apollo 14 and 16 die after exposure to this immense amount of radiation? And why are NASA only starting a project now to test the lunar radiation levels and what their effects would be on the human body if they have sent 12 men there already?

    17) The fabric space suits had a crotch to shoulder zipper. There should have been fast leakage of air since even a pinhole deflates a tyre in short order.

    1 The astronauts in these "pressurized" suits were easily able to bend their fingers, wrists, elbows, and knees at 5.2 p.s.i. and yet a boxer's 4 p.s.i. speed bag is virtually unbendable. The guys would have looked like balloon men if the suits had actually been pressurized.

    19) How did the astronauts leave the LEM? In the documentary 'Paper Moon' The host measures a replica of the LEM at The Space Centre in Houston, what he finds is that the 'official' measurements released by NASA are bogus and that the astronauts could not have got out of the LEM.

    20) The water sourced air conditioner backpacks should have produced frequent explosive vapour discharges. They never did.

    21) During the Apollo 14 flag setup ceremony, the flag would not stop fluttering.

    22) With more than a two second signal transmission round trip, how did a camera pan upward to track the departure of the Apollo 16 LEM? Gus Grissom, before he got burned alive in the Apollo I disaster A few minutes before he was burned to death in the Apollo I tragedy, Gus Grissom said, 'Hey, you guys in the control center, get with it. You expect me to go to the moon and you can't even maintain telephonic communications over three miles.' This statement says a lot about what Grissom thought about NASA's progress in the great space race.

    23) Why did NASA's administrator resign just days before the first Apollo mission?

    24) NASA launched the TETR-A satellite just months before the first lunar mission. The proclaimed purpose was to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that the Houston ground crews (all those employees sitting behind computer screens at Mission Control) could "rehearse" the first moon landing. In other words, though NASA claimed that the satellite crashed shortly before the first lunar mission (a misinformation lie), its real purpose was to relay voice, fuel consumption, altitude, and telemetry data as if the transmissions were coming from an Apollo spacecraft as it neared the moon. Very few NASA employees knew the truth because they believed that the computer and television data they were receiving was the genuine article. Merely a hundred or so knew what was really going on; not tens of thousands as it might first appear.

    25) In 1998, the Space Shuttle flew to one of its highest altitudes ever, three hundred and fifty miles, hundreds of miles below merely the beginning of the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Inside of their shielding, superior to that which the Apollo astronauts possessed, the shuttle astronauts reported being able to "see" the radiation with their eyes closed penetrating their shielding as well as the retinas of their closed eyes. For a dental x-ray on Earth which lasts 1/100th of a second we wear a 1/4 inch lead vest. Imagine what it would be like to endure several hours of radiation that you can see with your eyes closed from hundreds of miles away with 1/8 of an inch of aluminium shielding!

    26) The Apollo 1 fire of January 27, 1967, killed what would have been the first crew to walk on the Moon just days after the commander, Gus Grissom, held an unapproved press conference complaining that they were at least ten years, not two, from reaching the Moon. The dead man's own son, who is a seasoned pilot himself, has in his possession forensic evidence personally retrieved from the charred spacecraft (that the government has tried to destroy on two or more occasions). Gus Grissom was obviously trying to make a big statement as he placed a lemon in the window of the Apollo I spacecraft as it sat ready for launch!

    27) CNN issued the following report, "The radiation belts surrounding Earth may be more dangerous for astronauts than previously believed (like when they supposedly went through them thirty years ago to reach the Moon.) The phenomenon known as the 'Van Allen Belts' can spawn (newly discovered) 'Killer Electrons' that can dramatically affect the astronauts' health."

    2 In 1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer memory was 256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned building. In 2002 a top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of memory to run a simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the memory required to take off again once landed. The alleged computer on board Apollo 11 had 32k of memory. That's the equivalent of a simple calculator.

    29) If debris from the Apollo missions was left on the Moon, then it would be visible today through a powerful telescope, however no such debris can be seen. The Clementine probe that recently mapped the Moons surface failed to show any Apollo artefacts left by Man during the missions. Where did the Moon Buggy and base of the LM go?

    30) In the year 2005 NASA does not have the technology to land any man, or woman on the Moon, and return them safely to Earth.

    31) Film evidence has recently been uncovered of a mis-labelled, unedited, behind-the-scenes video film, showing the crew of Apollo 11 staging part of their photography. The film evidence is shown in the video "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!". and appears above in the 'Why Did Apollo 11 Astronauts Lie About Being In Deep Space?' section.

    32) Why did the blueprints and plans for the Lunar Module and Moon Buggy get destroyed if this was one of History's greatest accomplishments?

    33) Why did NASA need to airbrush out anomalies from lunar footage of the Moon if they have nothing to hide? The Apollo mission was meticulously planned, yet there were still flaws in the plan which the public is being made aware of as time goes on. Unlike a simple game of bingo where nothing is planned and no strategy is involved the Apollo mission was thought out and at the time there seemed to be an answer to every question that arose. As times change and more research is being done on the mission the tables are beginning to turn and the public is starting to see the truth.

  7. #1057

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Sakit na kaayo ang dughan ni Rodsky ani Doc. Grabe ra ba na siya ka fanatic aning moon landing. Olrayts.

    Wa diay ghapon makakita sa kamatuoran ning na deceive sa Moon Landing Show?
    Pagmata mo oi.

    By the way, interesado ko aning Spratly's jud. Naay mga hokos-pokos ani?

  8. #1058

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 View Post
    @THE SKULLS ....
    yes, what can I do for you springy?


    Quote Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 View Post
    Wrong analogy ka . We are talking about CREDIBILITIES here , not what is the TRUTH and not what is FAKE .
    so, you would like to say that US is credible?

    Quote Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 View Post
    So i digest pa gyud ug tarong kay lagpas man . Kung mangutana ka nako kung mo tuo ba ka nako or dili , wala ko mahimo ana .
    wala jud, wala sad ko mabuhat sa imo pagtu-o. entitled jud ka ana. and I will accept my errs springy, but after I polish everything. olrayts.

    Quote Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 View Post
    Pero ug mo ingon ka , asa man ang katu-uhan , si SPRINGY o si DOK ? kana diha makita ang credibilities as an example . Since daghan man awards si dok , mao na atong gi tuki kay gipahug man niya mas naa siyay alamag sa mga tinuod na experto aning butanga . Gets na nimo ?
    magbase diay ta sa awards para sa credibility? kinsa'y nagsulti pud nimo nga ikaw o si dok ang tuhu-an? mura sa'd ko'g nagpatambal ug abogado ana. pastilan, far out kaayo oi.

    motu-o jud ko niya kay mas sayon man i-digest ang proof about technicalities ni Dok, ikaw? kung ma-prove pud nimo in a way/sense nga motandi sa mga gisulti ni Dok, why would not I believe you. Expert man sad kaha ka.

    ato pud tingali tan-awon nga managlahi ta ug approach sa pagtan-aw sa usa ka butang springy, una ta makalimot ana. para madawat nato atong panaglahi ba. we don't need to debate, we all need is to collaborate.



    Quote Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 View Post
    Mintras puro DUDA ra ang naa nimo , dili na siya mahimong kamatuoran . Unsay gipalabas na man ninyo ni DOK ? Dili ba kamo ang KAMATUORAN o nakahibalo sa unsay tinuod ? Tsur oi .
    naa jud na sa korte ng benefit of the doubt ug beyond reasonable doubt. isn't it? dili ba reasonable ang mga pagduda namo? ahahahaha.


    Quote Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 View Post
    Mao na diha karon , kung mo sulti ko na di na tinuod ang sulti ninyo , suko man mo . Kinsay namersonal karon ? Subaya gud tanan diskusyon .
    kinsa'y nasuko? kinsa'y namersonal? ahahahaha
    kung nahibalo ug nasayod lang jud ka. kaila jud ka sa tawo nga mamersonal diri.

    good morning theowist!!!

    nahan ko aning Pythagorean Theorem, tun-an ko ni beh

  9. #1059

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by rodsky View Post
    It's NOT funny when established science becomes the object of jest and mockery.

    -RODION
    dude, para nako, mo-compliment man ang science sa fun.
    in real life situation, I have/had fun while doing chem exercises. but with total care and precautions. Can't you do it?

    I even had dastir as a lab gown.

    and it doesn't affect my performance.
    sun seems like a catalyst in my activities.
    faster and precise.

    oppps, do I need to present pictures?

    dili ni mockery ha.
    Last edited by THE SKULLS; 06-28-2011 at 07:39 AM.

  10. #1060

    Default Re: conspiracy theories

    if Science is a tool, then it's up to the craftsman how to use it in his own way that would benefit both sides.
    - The Skulls

  11.    Advertisement

Similar Threads

 
  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-01-2012, 09:57 AM
  2. Conspiracy Theory Why Noynoy Wins
    By Xilcher in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 05-11-2010, 11:01 PM
  3. Back to 9/11 ---> conspiracy theories.
    By weedmeister in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 03:26 AM
  4. Favourite Conspiracy Theories
    By Ramini in forum Spirituality & Occult - OLDER
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 05-06-2008, 08:03 PM
  5. another conspiracy theory thread
    By dieseldust in forum Spirituality & Occult - OLDER
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-04-2007, 08:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top